Funding a $60,000 Repair from a Nonqualified Annuity at 74
Ruth, 74, owns a nonqualified deferred annuity purchased nine years ago for $150,000. The contract value is $214,000. The surrender charge is 4% of account value in contract year nine and drops to 0% in year ten; the contract permits a 10% free withdrawal each year. She needs $60,000 this year for a home repair. Her agent proposes a section 1035 exchange into a new annuity with a 3% premium bonus and a fresh seven-year surrender schedule, or alternatively annuitizing the contract over 12 years under a life-with-10-year-certain option. Ruth is in the 24% federal bracket with $80,000 of other income.
1. What is the tax and charge result if Ruth simply withdraws $60,000 this year?
Read the worked answer
Gain in the contract: $214,000 − $150,000 = $64,000.
Taxation is LIFO. On a nonqualified annuity, withdrawals come out of gain first until gain is exhausted. Her $60,000 is therefore entirely ordinary income, even though she is only taking part of the contract value. At a 24% federal rate that is roughly $14,400, plus state tax.
No 10% penalty. She is past 59½, so the premature-distribution penalty does not apply.
Surrender charges:
- Free withdrawal: 10% × $214,000 = $21,400, no charge.
- Chargeable amount: $60,000 − $21,400 = $38,600.
- Surrender charge: $38,600 × 4% = $1,544.
Net cash to her: about $58,456 before income tax. Also check whether the contract carries a market value adjustment - if rates have risen since purchase, the effective cost can exceed the stated surrender charge.
2. Compare the three options - partial withdrawal, 1035 exchange, and annuitization - on cost, liquidity, and tax.
Read the worked answer
Option 1 - Partial withdrawal. Costs $1,544 in surrender charges; triggers $60,000 of ordinary income now. She keeps the remaining ~$154,000 invested, keeps access to it, and the 4% charge disappears entirely next year. Fully solves the liquidity problem.
Option 2 - 1035 exchange. Tax-deferred now, basis carries over ($150,000), and a 3% bonus adds about $6,420 of value - but many contracts treat a bonus as taxable income in the year credited, and the new contract imposes a seven-year surrender schedule on the entire $214,000. Critically, a 1035 exchange moves the whole contract; it produces no cash for the repair. She would have to pay the surrender charge on the new contract to get money out, so this option adds restriction and does not meet the need.
Option 3 - Annuitize over 12 years. Exclusion ratio = investment in contract ÷ expected return. If the $214,000 converts to roughly $22,000 a year for 12 years (expected return ~$264,000), the ratio is about 150,000 ÷ 264,000 ≈ 57%. Roughly $12,500 of each payment would be tax-free and $9,500 taxable, until her $150,000 basis is recovered, after which payments are fully taxable. But annuitization is generally irrevocable and produces no lump sum - it does not deliver $60,000 this year. If she dies before recovering basis, the unrecovered amount is deductible on her final return.
Bottom line: only the partial withdrawal actually solves the problem, and its cost is one year's surrender charge.
3. What would you recommend, and what tactics reduce the tax cost?
Read the worked answer
Recommendation: take the partial withdrawal, decline the 1035 exchange, and decline annuitization at this time.
Why the exchange fails the test: it neither raises cash nor improves her position. It extends illiquidity from one year to seven and adds a new bonus-recapture provision on top. A 3% bonus worth ~$6,420 does not compensate for a seven-year charge on a 74-year-old who has just demonstrated she may need funds.
Tax tactics:
- Use the full 10% free withdrawal ($21,400) this year.
- If the repair can be staged, take the balance after the contract anniversary, when the free-withdrawal allowance resets and the surrender charge is 0%.
- Do not split withdrawals across a year boundary without checking whether the next year's free amount plus the charge-free status makes waiting cheaper than paying $1,544.
- Remember that spreading withdrawals over two calendar years does not reduce total taxable gain - it only manages bracket creep against her $80,000 of other income.
What to tell her: the $64,000 of embedded gain will be taxed eventually. The question is only timing and whether she pays a surrender charge to accelerate it. Paying 4% on $38,600 to avoid a seven-year lock-up is the cheaper error.