MATSEC AM Accounting study materials
MATSEC AM Accounting study resources

MATSEC AM Accounting: Accounting Theory and Regulatory Framework: concepts and who governs them

MATSEC AM Accounting · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Accounting Theory and Regulatory Framework: concepts and who governs them

This domain checks that you can explain why accounting is done a certain way. It covers the conceptual framework, the standard-setting and endorsement process, the Maltese regulatory layer, and the main theories used to describe accounting choice.

The conceptual framework

  • Objective: provide financial information useful to existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors.
  • Fundamental characteristics: relevance (including materiality) and faithful representation (complete, neutral, free from error).
  • Enhancing characteristics: comparability, verifiability, timeliness, understandability.
  • Elements: asset, liability, equity, income, expenses; recognition, derecognition and measurement bases - historical cost, fair value, value in use, current cost.

Who sets and enforces the rules

  • The IASB issues IFRS after due process, with the IFRS Interpretations Committee resolving application questions.
  • EU endorsement under the IAS Regulation (1606/2002) makes IFRS mandatory for the consolidated accounts of listed EU companies.
  • In Malta, the Accountancy Profession Act (Cap 281) and the Accountancy Board regulate the profession, while the Companies Act (Cap 386) sets the reporting framework: GAPSME for qualifying entities, IFRS for the rest.

Worked example: policy or estimate?

A company changes its depreciation method from reducing balance to straight line. This is a change in accounting estimate, because it reflects new information about the pattern of consumption. Apply it prospectively from the date of change, do not restate comparatives, and disclose the nature and effect of the change. Moving from the cost model to the revaluation model, by contrast, is a change in accounting policy applied retrospectively.

Traps that cost marks

  • Treating prudence as deliberate understatement; it supports neutrality, not bias.
  • Quoting a fixed percentage as the materiality threshold.
  • Calling the framework a standard: it guides standard-setting and judgement where no standard applies.