MATSEC IM Home Economics study materials
MATSEC IM Home Economics study resources

Joseph's Independence: Balancing Risk and Autonomy

MATSEC IM Home Economics · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Joseph's Independence: Balancing Risk and Autonomy

Joseph, 81, has been widowed for ten months and lives alone in a first-floor flat with no lift. He has type 2 diabetes and osteoarthritis and takes five medicines, including metformin and a diuretic. Ten days ago he slipped in the bathroom; he was not hurt but was found by his daughter Carmen, who lives 25 km away and works full-time. A memory clinic score is 26/30. Joseph has home help for three hours a week and weekday Meals on Wheels, but he often skips breakfast and eats biscuits instead, and Carmen finds unopened medicine packets. He says, 'I've managed for 60 years and I'm not going anywhere.' His pension is €1,200 a month and two utility bills are unpaid. His son lives in Australia. Carmen is exhausted and asks whether residential care is the only safe option.

1. Using a named framework, assess Joseph's needs, identifying which are met and which are unmet. (12 marks)

Read the worked answer

Use Maslow's hierarchy plus ADL/IADL.

  • Physiological: Food is partly met by Meals on Wheels, but breakfast is skipped and biscuits replace meals - unmet. Medication is prescribed but packets are unopened - unmet. Warmth/shelter met.
  • Safety: Fall in the bathroom, no grab rails, first-floor flat with no lift, possible hypoglycaemia from missed meals and metformin, diuretic may cause nocturia and night-time falls - unmet. Unpaid bills threaten utilities - unmet.
  • Belonging/love: Widowed 10 months, son in Australia, daughter stretched; risk of loneliness - partly met by daughter and home help.
  • Esteem: Joseph values independence and says 'I'm fine'; being 'managed' could threaten dignity - needs careful support.
  • Self-actualisation: limited by isolation and health. ADLs (bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, feeding) are largely intact; IADLs (medication management, finances, shopping, cooking) are impaired. The memory score of 26/30 is borderline and should be interpreted alongside function, not used alone.

2. Recommend three priorities for a support plan, justifying each in terms of risk, Joseph's autonomy and cost. (12 marks)

Read the worked answer

Priorities:

  1. Bathroom safety and falls prevention - OT assessment, grab rails, non-slip mat, night light, review of diuretic timing. Justification: a fall is the most immediate risk to life and independence; low cost (often provided by health service); preserves autonomy because it lets him stay home.
  2. Medication and meal routine - pharmacy blister pack, alarm/reminder, GP review, breakfast delivered or a simple breakfast plan; check blood glucose. Justification: missed metformin and meals can cause hyper/hypoglycaemia and falls; a blister pack is cheap and supports independence; Carmen's anxiety reduces.
  3. Social and bereavement support - day centre, lunch club, neighbour check-in, regular family call rota. Justification: loneliness and depression affect self-care; low cost; builds a network rather than relying on Carmen alone. Also: benefits check and bill payment plan. Residential care is not the first option: it is expensive and may increase confusion and loss of control. Agree a 4-week trial and review.

3. Discuss the tension between safeguarding Joseph and respecting his right to make his own decisions, and explain how Carmen and professionals should involve him. (10 marks)

Read the worked answer

Joseph has a right to make his own decisions if he has capacity. Capacity is decision-specific: he may be able to decide about his bathroom but not about complex finances. Professionals should presume capacity, explain the risks in plain language, listen to his reasons, and offer choices ('grab rails or a shower chair first?'). Carmen should be included with Joseph's consent; a family meeting can air concerns without turning into a takeover. Safeguarding does not mean doing to him; it means reducing risk with him. If he refuses all help and risks are serious, a best-interests process with health and social care is appropriate, using the least restrictive option. A trial of support, with review, respects autonomy and gives evidence. Residential care should be discussed honestly as one option, including a respite stay, not presented as a threat.