MTEL SEI (56) study materials
MTEL SEI (56) study resources

The Newcomer Who Fails Every Word Problem

MTEL SEI (56) · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Newcomer Who Fails Every Word Problem

Mr. Delgado teaches fourth-grade math at an urban elementary school. Mariela arrived from Guatemala six weeks ago; she is WIDA Level 1, Spanish-dominant, and her schooling was interrupted for part of second grade. On a Spanish-language diagnostic she scored at grade level in computation, and she accurately solves multi-digit multiplication and compares fractions when the items are numeric. On last week's eight-item word-problem quiz she scored 0/8, writing '?' or leaving items blank. In class she answers 'yes' when asked whether she understands and copies from the peers beside her. The prereferral team meets Friday, and the school psychologist has already suggested a referral for a math-specific learning disability, noting that 'she is not responding to instruction.' Mariela has had no systematic English math vocabulary instruction and no L1 support in math class.

1. What data and analysis would you bring to Friday's prereferral meeting, and what does the pattern of Mariela's performance most likely indicate?

Read the worked answer

Bring a precise description of the pattern, not a general impression: accurate multi-digit multiplication and fraction comparison with numerals, grade-level performance on a Spanish diagnostic, 0/8 on word problems in English, six weeks in the country, no documented instruction in English math language, and a response style of blanks and question marks rather than wrong computations.

That pattern most likely indicates a language barrier, not a math disability. Word problems load working memory with academic vocabulary ('each,' 'left,' 'times as many'), complex syntax (comparatives, passive voice, embedded clauses), and cultural contexts that may be unfamiliar. A student can hold the math concept and still score zero. Blanks and question marks suggest she did not know how to enter the task, not that she computed incorrectly - a distinction that matters.

The team needs three kinds of evidence before any referral: does she solve the same problems when the language is removed or supported through Spanish? Has she received adequate, documented instruction in problem-solving language? Is the difficulty specific to math language or general across content areas? Without those, a referral is premature and risks misidentifying a language difference as a disability.

2. Describe a specific diagnostic you would run next week and explain what an L1-versus-English comparison would tell you.

Read the worked answer

Give three or four problems from the same quiz in three conditions, one on one: (1) the problem read aloud and discussed in Spanish; (2) the English text with a picture, a glossary, and manipulatives; (3) English only. Ask her to say what the problem is asking before she solves it, and record her words verbatim.

Interpretation: if she solves the problems with the Spanish read-aloud and explains her reasoning, the barrier is English and the intervention target is academic language, not math. If she solves the English items with a glossary but not without it, the target is vocabulary and she needs systematic pre-teaching rather than special education. If she cannot solve them even in Spanish with manipulatives, or her errors are computational and inconsistent across languages, that raises a genuine math concern and justifies moving toward a referral with that evidence attached.

Do not rely on 'Do you understand?' She says yes and copies peers because those are politeness and survival strategies common among newcomers, not evidence of comprehension. Require a demonstration - restate the problem, point to the quantity, or draw the situation - and note whether she can do that. The comparison is the whole point: it isolates language from mathematics.

3. Outline a six-to-eight-week instructional plan before any special education referral, including how you would monitor response to intervention.

Read the worked answer

Provide targeted support inside the regular math block. Each week pre-teach five to seven problem-solving terms with visuals and Spanish cognates; use numberless word problems (tell the story, discuss what is happening, then reveal the question); explicitly teach the three or four problem types in the unit with a consistent routine (read, restate, represent, solve, check); give her a bilingual glossary and a bilingual partner for restating problems; and allow her to explain a problem in Spanish before solving it in English. Keep the grade-level content and the same problem types - the support changes the route, not the destination.

Monitor with weekly four-item probes and a running record of which component breaks down: vocabulary, syntax, or reasoning. Keep dated work samples and brief conference notes. Set the decision rule now, in writing: if after six to eight weeks of consistent documented intervention she still cannot solve problems she can solve in Spanish, bring that data to the team. That record both strengthens any eventual referral and protects her from being referred for what may be inadequate instruction.