Borderline Performance on a Mock OSCE Station
You are a pharmacist preceptor at a tertiary teaching hospital. A final-year pharmacy student completes a 10-minute mock OSCE station on counseling a patient about a new warfarin prescription. The station has a 20-item checklist: 5 communication items, 10 content items, and 5 process items. The student scores 12/20. Two critical safety items are missed: bleeding precautions and the interaction with NSAIDs. The passing standard is 14/20 with no critical items missed. The student had good rapport and organization but froze when the patient asked about bruising. The summative OSCE is in two weeks, and remediation time is limited. The student is upset and says, 'I knew it, I just blanked.' The course coordinator asks you to interpret the result and plan next steps.
1. How do you interpret the student's score using the rubric and passing standard?
Read the worked answer
- The total score is 12/20, below the passing standard of 14/20.
- In addition, two critical safety items were missed. Critical items are usually non-compensatory: a candidate cannot pass the station by scoring well elsewhere if a critical safety item is failed.
- Therefore, the station result is a fail, despite good rapport and organization.
- A global rating should support the checklist result: the student did not demonstrate safe warfarin counseling.
2. What feedback and remediation plan would you provide in the two weeks available?
Read the worked answer
- Give specific, behavior-based feedback promptly. Use a plus-delta format: strengths (rapport, organization) and gaps (bleeding precautions, NSAID interaction, INR monitoring).
- Focus remediation on the critical safety items: teach-back, a warfarin counseling checklist, and role-play with a standardized patient or peer.
- Set SMART goals and schedule a repeat practice station within one week.
- Provide written resources and ask the student to self-assess before the next session.
- Reassess using the same rubric; if still failing critical items, escalate to the course coordinator for a formal remediation plan.
3. How should the result and plan be documented and communicated to ensure fairness and defensibility?
Read the worked answer
- Document the numerical score, the specific critical items missed, the feedback given, and the remediation plan with dates.
- Communicate with the course coordinator and, if applicable, the student affairs office according to institutional policy.
- Keep the process transparent and consistent with other students; use the same rubric and passing standard.
- Avoid changing the standard because the student is upset or because rapport was good.
- Offer support (e.g., study resources, counseling services) while maintaining the requirement to demonstrate safe practice.