MSCE History study materials
MSCE History study resources

After Chilembwe: Punishment or Reform? The 1916 Commission of Inquiry

MSCE History · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

After Chilembwe: Punishment or Reform? The 1916 Commission of Inquiry

You are a missionary adviser to a commission of inquiry set up in 1916 after the Chilembwe uprising. The commission has heard three kinds of evidence. First, the uprising began after Africans were recruited as porters for the First World War and after a German attack near the lake; many porters died. Second, in Chiradzulu, African families had lost land to estates, and many men worked for three months a year as thangata labour rent. Third, John Chilembwe's sermons condemned the treatment of Africans and predicted that God would punish the oppressors. The settler press demands that chiefs who supported the rebels be hanged and that the mission be closed. The Colonial Office wants a short report that restores order without provoking another revolt. You have ten days and can make only three recommendations.

1. Rank the causes of the uprising in order of importance and justify your ranking.

Read the worked answer

The immediate trigger was the First World War recruitment and the German attack, because they created a sense of crisis and showed that colonial rule could not protect Africans. But the deeper causes were land alienation and thangata labour in Chiradzulu, which destroyed the economic base of families and made colonial rule feel permanent. Chilembwe's religious message was the spark that turned grievance into organised action: it gave people a language of justice and a leader.

I would rank land and labour first, wartime recruitment second, and religious leadership third, because without the first two Chilembwe would have had little following. However, ranking is not the same as causation: all three interacted. The commission should not treat the uprising as simply a religious fanatic's plot, nor as simply a labour dispute.

2. What are the likely consequences of exemplary punishment versus reform? Which is more likely to restore order?

Read the worked answer

Exemplary punishment would satisfy settlers and might deter immediate resistance, but it would also create martyrs, deepen African distrust of chiefs who collaborated, and leave the land and labour grievances untouched. Reform, such as investigating land claims, regulating thangata, and improving porter conditions, would address causes but would be resisted by settlers and could be seen as weakness.

In the short term, a combination is likely: punish the leaders who used violence, but announce a commission on land and labour and remove the worst abuses. The commission should not promise political equality, which is beyond its power, but it can recommend that Africans have legal access to land and that chiefs are not forced to supply labour. The longer-term risk of doing nothing is another revolt.

3. Write one recommendation that addresses a root cause without conceding political equality.

Read the worked answer

Recommend that the government establish a land commission for Chiradzulu with authority to restore unoccupied estate land to African villages and to fix fair rents, while explicitly stating that this is a measure of economic justice, not a step toward self-government. This addresses the land grievance, which is the deepest cause, and it gives chiefs a reason to cooperate with the administration.

It does not concede the franchise or legislative representation. It should be paired with a labour ordinance limiting thangata to a stated number of days and with a review of porter recruitment. The recommendation is politically feasible because it can be presented as restoring order and protecting property, not as a reward for rebellion.