Cooling-Off or Switch After a Market Fall
Mr Tan, aged 38, invests RM30,000 of cash savings into a domestic equity unit trust fund on Monday 4 March. The management company receives his application and signed acknowledgement of the prospectus and Product Highlights Sheet on the same day. The fund carries a 5% sales charge, a 1.8% p.a. management fee and a 1% switching fee based on the switch value. There is no redemption fee. On Thursday 7 March the domestic equity market falls 7% and Mr Tan, who has a five-year horizon but has never experienced a loss, calls to move everything into the company's money market fund. He asks whether he should 'cancel' the investment or 'switch' it, and whether he can get back the sales charge. The company's cooling-off policy follows the standard six-business-day right from receipt of the prospectus and application.
1. Is Mr Tan within the cooling-off period, and what is the practical difference between using cooling-off and switching? Show the cost consequences.
Read the worked answer
Step 1 - timing. The management company received the application and prospectus acknowledgement on Monday 4 March. Counting six business days from receipt gives a deadline of Tuesday 12 March, or 11 March if the receipt day is counted. The Thursday 7 March call is comfortably within the window on either convention.
Step 2 - nature of the right. Cooling-off is a withdrawal of the investment, not a switch. The prospectus governs the refund basis; typically it is the investment amount less the sales charge already paid. A switch is a redemption from Fund A and a purchase of Fund B at the next computed NAV, so it is not a cancellation.
Step 3 - cost. The 5% sales charge on RM30,000 is RM1,500 and is sunk either way. A switch costs 1% of the switched value, about RM300, and is done at the fallen NAV. Cooling-off avoids the RM300 switching fee but takes him out of the market entirely; re-entering later would incur a new sales charge.
Conclusion. If he genuinely no longer wants the equity fund, cooling-off is the cleaner exit. If he wants to stay invested but reduce risk, a switch to the money market fund is the correct mechanism, and the RM300 cost is the price of that change.
2. What advice should be given about suitability, and how should the adviser avoid treating cooling-off as a free market-timing tool?
Read the worked answer
The decision should not be framed as market timing. A 7% fall in three days is normal equity volatility; if it has destroyed his willingness to stay invested, the original risk assessment was flawed. Cooling-off should be used only if he regrets the purchase after understanding the product, not because he expects to re-enter at a lower price.
A five-year horizon does not automatically make a full exit to money market appropriate. A balanced fund or a partial switch may better match his goal while reducing equity exposure. The adviser should document the discussion, give him the Product Highlights Sheet for any target fund, and explain that the sales charge is not refunded on a switch. The prospectus should be checked for the exact cooling-off refund basis and any restriction on repeated cooling-off use.