Retired Income Client, Concentrated Small-Cap and Margin
A 68-year-old retiree opens an account with RM 1.2 million in savings. Her stated objectives are RM 6,500 per month of income to supplement a small pension, and preservation of capital; she also wants RM 200,000 available within 30 days for a possible medical procedure. She has no investment experience beyond fixed deposits and has never held a margin account. The dealer's proposal allocates RM 600,000 (50%) to a single ACE Market construction company with a market capitalisation of RM 310 million, a free float of 18%, a dividend yield of 2.4% and average daily traded value of about RM 120,000; RM 300,000 to an unrated 7-year corporate bond; and RM 250,000 to a margin-financed position in the same construction stock, taking total exposure to that issuer above 60%. The client says she "trusts" the dealer, who is a family friend, and asks him to "just do whatever is best".
1. Assess whether the proposed allocation is suitable. Identify each mismatch and state what the dealer should do before any order is placed.
Read the worked answer
Work through the objective, liquidity, concentration and leverage tests separately, because each fails on its own.
Income. RM 600,000 at 2.4% yields RM 14,400 a year, or RM 1,200 a month. Even a generous 5% on the RM 300,000 unrated bond adds RM 15,000, or RM 1,250 a month. The portfolio produces roughly RM 2,450 a month against a RM 6,500 requirement - about 38%. The gap can only be met by consuming capital, which contradicts preservation of capital.
Liquidity. RM 200,000 must be available within 30 days. The construction stock trades about RM 120,000 a day. A RM 600,000 position is five full days of turnover; at a realistic 20-25% participation rate it takes 20-25 trading days to exit, and the price impact in an 18%-float stock would be material precisely when the client needs cash.
Concentration. More than 60% in one small-cap issuer, plus borrowed money, plus a family-friend relationship that has suppressed the client's own judgement.
Leverage. She has never held a margin account. A 22% fall in a stock with a 60% weighting destroys a large part of the portfolio and triggers a call she cannot meet without selling the illiquid line.
Conclusion: unsuitable. The dealer must re-profile, put the rationale in writing, propose a portfolio that actually meets the income and liquidity needs (a ladder of deposits or short government securities, a diversified bond fund, liquid dividend equities), and not place the order on the current plan.
2. The client says "just do whatever is best" and asks the dealer to proceed without further discussion. How should the dealer treat that instruction, and what must be on file?
Read the worked answer
"Do whatever is best" is not an instruction and cannot be treated as discretionary authority. Discretion requires a written mandate, agreed parameters and informed consent; absent that, every trade needs a specific instruction.
Steps: (1) Explain in plain language the specific risks - income shortfall, illiquidity, margin calls, single-issuer concentration. (2) Record the conversation in a contemporaneous file note: what was said, what alternatives were offered, the client's responses. (3) If she still wants to proceed, obtain the instruction in writing and have a supervisor countersign - but check the firm's policy first, because many firms prohibit leveraged small-cap concentration for retired income clients outright, in which case the dealer must decline rather than document around it. (4) Confirm the risk-profile document reflects a conversation actually held with her, not a reconstruction after the fact. (5) If the family relationship is impairing objectivity, consider transferring the account to another dealer.
The dealer's duty is to give the advice a competent professional would give on these facts, not to give effect to an uninformed preference. Where the product is unsuitable, "the client insisted" mitigates but does not eliminate liability; the file must show advice against, not merely consent.
3. Eight months later the construction stock has fallen 22% and a margin call is due. Quantify the exit problem and set out what the firm must do.
Read the worked answer
Quantify before acting. Position RM 600,000; average daily traded value RM 120,000. Selling at 25% of daily volume (RM 30,000 a day) takes about 20 trading days. At 50% (RM 60,000 a day) it takes 10 days but would likely move the price several percent against her. A forced liquidation on a margin call is worse: the firm sells into the same thin market and crystallises the loss.
Margin mechanics: at, say, 60% initial margin, the RM 250,000 financed amount supports roughly RM 625,000 of stock. A 22% fall reduces value to about RM 487,000, leaving equity of roughly RM 112,000 against a maintenance requirement - a call. She has no cash buffer, so the only source of funds is the illiquid stock, the same stock that triggered the call.
Correct course: build a written exit plan now - staged sales, limit orders, no crossing with other client accounts at stale prices - and reduce leverage pre-emptively. Inform the client in writing of the call mechanics before it happens, not after. If a call occurs, follow the firm's close-out policy strictly, document every attempt to contact her, and never treat her other holdings as a substitute source of margin without written authority.