A Camp Timeline for Paul's Voyage
A school Christian Union in Kuching plans a 'Journey with Paul' overnight camp. The 40 campers will rotate through five stations based on Acts 27–28. The committee has three constraints: each station lasts 25 minutes; the camp must end with a 10-minute reflection on 'God's promise in a storm'; and two parents have asked whether the 'we' passages mean Luke was on board. The committee's draft stations are: A, the storm and the angel's promise; B, the shipwreck and swimming to shore; C, the viper on Malta; D, Publius's father healed; E, Paul preaches in Rome. A committee member wants to add 'Paul's trial before Agrippa' from Acts 26, but another says that is a different journey and will confuse the timeline.
1. Place the five draft stations in the order of Acts 27–28 and give one specific textual detail for each that the station leader must get right.
Read the worked answer
The order is A, B, C, D, E. (A) The storm and the angel: the wind is called the northeaster (27:14); the angel says Paul must stand before Caesar and that God has granted him all who sail with him (27:24); there are 276 on board (27:37), and they have gone fourteen days without food (27:33). (B) Shipwreck: the ship runs aground on a reef, the bow sticks and the stern breaks up (27:41); the centurion stops the soldiers from killing the prisoners because he wants to save Paul (27:43); all 276 reach land, some swimming and some on planks (27:44; 28:1). (C) Viper: the native people of Malta show unusual kindness and build a fire; a viper fastens on Paul's hand, he shakes it into the fire and suffers no harm (28:2–5); the locals first call him a murderer, then a god (28:4, 6). (D) Publius: he is the chief man of the island; his father has fever and dysentery; Paul prays, lays hands on him and heals him (28:7–8); others on the island then come and are cured (28:9). (E) Rome: after three months they sail in an Alexandrian ship marked with the Dioscuri (28:11); Paul reaches Puteoli, the Forum of Appius and Three Taverns, and in Rome lives under guard for two whole years, proclaiming the kingdom and teaching about Jesus 'with all boldness and without hindrance' (28:30–31).
2. Should the committee add Paul before Agrippa (Acts 26)? Give a reasoned answer from the structure of Acts and the camp's aim.
Read the worked answer
Acts 26 is not part of the voyage; it belongs to the Caesarea custody and the series of hearings before Felix, Festus and Agrippa. Paul there recounts his conversion and commission and almost persuades Agrippa, while Festus calls him mad (26:24–29). The chapter explains why Paul is going to Rome: he has appealed to Caesar (25:11–12), and the risen Lord had already said he must testify in Rome (23:11). The camp's aim is 'God's promise in a storm', which is anchored in 27:23–25. Adding Acts 26 as a sixth station would crowd the 25-minute rotation and blur the sequence, but it could work as a five-minute prologue before station A, not as a replacement for any station. If the committee uses it, the leader should say plainly: 'This happens before the ship; it explains why Paul is a prisoner going to Rome.' Otherwise campers will think Paul appears before Agrippa on Malta. The timeline should be: arrest and hearings, appeal, voyage, shipwreck, Malta, Rome.
3. Two parents ask about the 'we' passages. What can the committee honestly say about the narrator's presence, and what should it not claim?
Read the worked answer
The committee should say three things. First, the 'we' passages are real textual signals: the narrator includes himself at 27:1 and 28:1–2, 11–16, and also at 16:10–17; 20:5–15; 21:1–18. The most natural reading is that the author travelled with Paul on at least those sections, including the voyage. Second, Acts does not name the author in the text. The identification with Luke is an early church tradition, supported by the 'beloved physician' in Colossians 4:14 and by Philemon 24 and 2 Timothy 4:11, but the committee should not claim that Acts 27 says 'Luke was on board'. Third, the 'we' does not prove that the author was an eyewitness of every event in Acts; it marks his participation in these travels. For parents, the honest answer is: 'The text presents the narrator as a companion on this voyage; the church has traditionally identified him as Luke. We are not adding to the text when we say that.'