Statutory Demand, Preferential Payment and the Rescue Option
Layang-Layang Logistics Sdn Bhd has three trade creditors: Northport Fuel (RM420,000), Sarawak Haulage (RM310,000) and a related company, Layang-Layang Warehousing (RM260,000). It has RM120,000 cash, no overdraft, and monthly losses of about RM90,000. On 2 April, Northport serves a statutory demand for RM420,000. On 9 April, before the 21-day period expires, the managing director pays RM200,000 to the related company because 'it is family'. The company continues to take new haulage contracts and incurs RM400,000 of new debt. On 5 May, Northport petitions to wind up the company. The directors now want to apply for judicial management, but the related company has registered a charge over the company's trucks; the charge was created in February for an old loan. A major customer has offered a three-year contract that would restore positive cash flow if the company can obtain a moratorium.
1. Is Layang-Layang insolvent, and what is the effect of the statutory demand?
Read the worked answer
Insolvency has two tests: inability to pay debts as they fall due (cash-flow) and liabilities exceeding assets (balance-sheet). On the figures, the company has RM120,000 cash against RM990,000 of trade debt and monthly losses of RM90,000. That is cash-flow insolvency. The statutory demand for RM420,000 is not a mere warning: if the company fails to pay, secure or compound the debt to Northport's reasonable satisfaction within 21 days, it is presumed unable to pay its debts, and that presumption supports a winding-up petition. The company should not ignore the demand. It can dispute the debt in writing, negotiate, or apply to restrain presentation, but it must act within the period. The related-company debt does not reduce the pressure; it may worsen it if the payment is challenged. The secretary should diarise the 21-day deadline and ensure the board records its response.
2. Analyse the RM200,000 payment to the related company and the February charge.
Read the worked answer
The payment was made when the company was already insolvent and after the statutory demand. A payment to a related creditor can be a voidable preference if it puts that creditor in a better position than it would have been in a winding up, and if the company intended to prefer it. The 'family' reason is exactly the kind of motive that supports a preference claim. The look-back period is longer for related persons. The charge over the trucks is also vulnerable: it was created in February for an old loan, so it may be a preference or a charge given for no new value. If the company is wound up, the liquidator can challenge both the payment and the charge and recover the RM200,000 or set aside the security. The directors who authorised the payment may be personally liable if they breached their duty to creditors. The secretary should preserve the board papers and not create retrospective minutes.
3. Can judicial management succeed, and what should the secretary do?
Read the worked answer
Judicial management is designed for rehabilitation, not for a company that is simply out of cash. The applicant must show that the company is or is likely to become unable to pay its debts and that judicial management is likely to achieve either survival or a better result for creditors than winding up. The three-year contract is the strongest point, but the court will weigh the existing charge, the preference payment and the new RM400,000 debt. A moratorium would restrain Northport, but a secured creditor may seek leave to enforce. The related company's charge will be scrutinised; if it is set aside, the trucks may be available to the rescue. The directors should prepare a cash-flow forecast, a restructuring plan and evidence of the customer contract. The secretary should convene the board, record the solvency analysis, file the application documents, notify creditors as required, and ensure no further preferential payments are made. Judicial management is not a shield for misconduct.