Whose Judgement Is It? A Child Narrator and a Thesis About the Mother
A candidate in a prose-fiction class writes on a set short story of about 1,200 words, told in the first person by a nine-year-old narrator. The narrator describes her mother staying in bed with the curtains drawn, reports 'a sadness that had no name', and quotes her father saying 'your mother is just tired'. At one point the narrator says 'I hated her for it'. The candidate's thesis reads: 'The writer conveys that mothers who work outside the home damage their children.' The supporting paragraph quotes 'I hated her for it' and comments only that it 'shows the child's anger'. The story has no authorial voice: everything reaches the reader through the child, and the father's euphemism is the main device by which the adult world withholds information. Six of the twelve candidates in the class made the same move in their drafts.
1. Explain what the candidate has conflated, and why the conflated reading cannot be supported from this story's narrative technique.
Read the worked answer
The candidate has conflated the narrator with the implied author. In a first-person child narration there is no voice in the text that endorses the child's judgements; there is only the child's voice and whatever the reader can infer around it. 'I hated her for it' is the narrator's statement, made by a nine-year-old with limited information. It is evidence of the child's state of mind, not of the story's attitude towards the mother.
This matters for the thesis. 'The writer conveys that mothers who work outside the home damage their children' attributes a proposition to the text. But the text's central device is withholding: the father says 'your mother is just tired', and the word 'just' closes down the question the child is trying to ask. The reader is placed in the same position as the child, knowing that the explanation is inadequate but not being given a better one. The gap between what the child reports and what the reader suspects is where the story's meaning lives, and it is precisely a gap the candidate has closed by treating the child's line as the author's verdict. The result is an assertion the text does not licence, supported by a quotation that is doing the opposite work.
2. Rewrite the thesis so that it is arguable from the narrative technique, and show how the 'I hated her for it' quotation would then function.
Read the worked answer
Rewritten thesis:
The story does not blame the mother; it shows how a child's limited understanding and an adult's euphemism together make her illness unnameable, and the child's anger is the cost of that failure of language.
With this thesis, 'I hated her for it' changes role. It is no longer proof of the story's attitude; it is the symptom the story is diagnosing. The paragraph would run: the narrator offers 'I hated her for it' without knowing what 'it' refers to, and the vagueness of the pronoun is the point, because the child has been given 'tired' as the only available word for her mother's condition. Her hatred fills a gap that no adult has filled with an explanation. The father's 'just' is the device that maintains the gap, and the story's pathos comes from the reader seeing what the child cannot: that the mother is ill and the child's anger is aimed at the wrong target.
The test of the new thesis is that it could be disputed by a reader who thinks the story does blame the mother. A thesis nobody could argue against is usually a summary in disguise.
3. A classmate objects: 'But the child is the narrator, so her feelings are the story's feelings.' Construct the reply you would give, using the father's dialogue as your main evidence.
Read the worked answer
Reply:
The narrator's feelings are certainly in the story; the question is whether they are the story's judgement. Those are different claims, and the father's dialogue shows the difference.
When the father says 'your mother is just tired', three things happen at once. The child records it accurately, as children do with phrases they sense are evasions. The father means it, or means it as the version he can manage. And the reader hears the inadequacy of the word 'tired' for a woman who cannot leave her bed. The story does not need an authorial voice to tell us the explanation is thin; it relies on our recognising the gap between the adult's words and the visible situation. That gap is a structural feature of the narration, not an opinion expressed by anyone in it.
So the child's 'I hated her for it' is reliable as a report of feeling and unreliable as a judgement about cause. A first-person child narrator is the simplest case of a narrator whose account is complete and whose interpretation is not. The story's feelings are produced by the reader's movement between those two levels, which is something no single character, including the narrator, can supply.