NSSCAS Chemistry (8224) study materials
NSSCAS Chemistry (8224) study resources

NSSCAS Chemistry (8224): Practical Skills and Experimental Techniques

NSSCAS Chemistry (8224) · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Practical Skills and Experimental Techniques

Practical skills and experimental techniques tests the accuracy of measurements, titration technique, separation methods, gas tests, data processing and evaluation of errors.

Core rules

  • Read a burette to ±0.05 cm3; a 25 cm3 pipette and volumetric flask are more precise than a measuring cylinder.
  • Rinse the burette with the titrant and the pipette with the solution it delivers; rinse the conical flask with distilled water. Record initial and final readings and use concordant titres within 0.10 cm3.
  • Percentage uncertainty = (uncertainty/measurement) × 100. A burette reading has two readings per titre, so the uncertainty is ±0.10 cm3.
  • Separation: filtration removes insoluble solids; crystallisation recovers a soluble salt; simple distillation separates a solvent from a non-volatile solute; fractional distillation separates miscible liquids with different boiling points; a separating funnel separates immiscible liquids.
  • Gas tests: H2 gives a squeaky pop; O2 relights a glowing splint; CO2 turns limewater milky; Cl2 bleaches damp litmus; NH3 turns damp red litmus blue.
  • Evaluation should distinguish random from systematic error and suggest a specific improvement, not 'be more careful'.

Worked example

A titre is 24.30 cm3 from a burette with an uncertainty of ±0.05 cm3 per reading. Two readings give ±0.10 cm3. Percentage uncertainty = (0.10/24.30) × 100 = 0.41%. If the rough titre is 24.60 cm3, it is excluded from the mean because it was not used to find the end-point. The mean uses only concordant accurate titres.

Traps

Including the rough titre in the mean; reading the top of the meniscus; using the final burette reading as the titre without subtracting the initial reading; putting the measurement rather than the uncertainty in the numerator; describing 'human error' without saying what was done; failing to control variables in a comparison.