I85PREP
⌘ K
NABIP Medicare study materials
NABIP Medicare study resources

NABIP Medicare: Fraud, Waste, and Abuse (FWA): Definitions, Statutes, and Agent Risk

NABIP Medicare · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Fraud, Waste, and Abuse (FWA): Definitions, Statutes, and Agent Risk

Domain 3 tests whether you can distinguish the three categories and recognize the federal statutes that turn a bad sales practice into a civil or criminal exposure.

The three categories

  • Fraud is intentional deception or misrepresentation that the person knows could result in unauthorized benefit.
  • Waste is overutilization or inefficiency that causes unnecessary cost, without intent.
  • Abuse is conduct inconsistent with sound fiscal or business practice that results in unnecessary cost - not necessarily intentional.

The statutes to know

  • False Claims Act: knowingly presenting or causing a false claim to be presented to a federal program. Remedies include treble damages plus per-claim penalties, and private relators can sue on the government's behalf (qui tam).
  • Anti-Kickback Statute: knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting, or receiving remuneration to induce referrals for federally payable items or services. It is intent-based and has safe harbors.
  • Stark Law: physician self-referral for designated health services; strict liability, so intent is irrelevant.
  • Civil Monetary Penalties Law / beneficiary inducement rule: prohibits inducements likely to influence a beneficiary's plan selection. A nominal-value exception permits items worth no more than $15 per item and $75 per beneficiary per year.
  • Exclusion authorities: OIG's List of Excluded Individuals/Entities (LEIE); billing for an excluded person is itself a violation.

Red flags agents encounter

Enrolling a beneficiary who never consented; falsifying or backdating a Scope of Appointment; enrolling someone to hit a commission tier; paying beneficiaries or unlicensed lead generators per enrollment; sharing Medicare Beneficiary Identifiers outside permitted channels; "free" gift cards conditioned on enrollment.

Worked example

An agent offers a $50 gift card to every beneficiary who enrolls in his plan. That is a beneficiary inducement exceeding the $15/$75 nominal-value limit, exposing him to civil money penalties; if the resulting enrollments generate federal capitation payments, a False Claims Act theory becomes available too. The lack of intent to defraud does not save the inducement charge.

Traps that cost marks

Treating waste as fraud; assuming a kickback must be cash (anything of value counts, including free office space or waived cost-sharing); and believing the $15 nominal gift limit is a monthly allowance rather than an annual $75 cap per beneficiary.