Late Brady Disclosure Six Days Before Trial
Elena Ruiz is charged with aggravated assault in state court. Trial is set for June 3. The local discovery rule requires the prosecution to produce discovery at least 30 days before trial and to give expert notice at least 21 days before trial. Ninety days ago, defense counsel served a broad request for all exculpatory and impeachment material. On May 28, the prosecutor emails a supplemental packet: (1) a May 20 lab report showing no gunshot residue on Ruiz’s hands; (2) a recorded interview with a store clerk who says she saw someone matching Ruiz’s height and jacket run from the scene but could not identify the person; and (3) a note that the prosecution may call a firearms examiner to say residue can be absent after washing hands. Defense counsel is in trial in another county and cannot review the packet until May 30. The paralegal must triage the disclosure, calculate deadlines, and prepare a plan for counsel.
1. Is each item Brady material, Giglio material, or neither? Explain how you would classify and prioritize them.
Read the worked answer
The no-residue lab report is potentially favorable and material if the prosecution’s theory depends on Ruiz firing a weapon. Absence of residue does not prove she did not fire, because residue can be removed, but it undercuts a residue-based inference and may support a defense argument. It is Brady material, subject to the materiality test. The clerk’s inability to identify Ruiz is impeachment and weak-identification evidence; if identification is disputed, it is both Brady and Giglio material because it undercuts the state’s identification proof. The firearms examiner’s note is not Brady material in the ordinary sense because it is inculpatory or explanatory; it is a late expert-notice issue. It matters strategically because it may neutralize the no-residue report, so the paralegal should not treat the lab report as a standalone win. Prioritize the clerk recording and the lab report first because they bear on identity and actus reus; then address the examiner’s proposed testimony. Request the complete lab file and the full clerk interview, not just the summary.
2. What motions or requests should be prepared before June 3, and in what order?
Read the worked answer
The discovery deadline was May 4 and the expert-notice deadline was May 13, so both the May 28 packet and any examiner testimony are late. The first filing should be a written objection and demand for complete disclosure, preserving the Brady issue and asking the prosecutor to produce the unredacted recording, lab bench notes, chain of custody, and examiner file immediately. Second, file a motion to compel and for an expedited hearing, with a request for sanctions or an order precluding the late expert. Third, prepare a motion in limine to exclude the firearms examiner if proper notice is not given; in the alternative, ask for a short continuance so defense counsel can retain a rebuttal expert. Do not simply move to suppress the evidence; Brady violations are remedied through disclosure, continuance, exclusion, or other appropriate relief, not necessarily suppression. The paralegal should calculate the exact days remaining, draft a chronology of the request and disclosure, and prepare a proposed order that gives the court alternatives: compel and continue, exclude the examiner, or limit the examiner’s testimony.
3. How should the paralegal document the disclosure and communicate with the client while counsel is unavailable?
Read the worked answer
Create a dated log entry showing when the packet arrived, what it contained, and that counsel was notified. Preserve the original email and make hash-marked or read-only copies of the recording and report. Prepare a factual memo for counsel that separates what is known from what is inferred, and note the May 4 and May 13 deadlines and the June 3 trial date. Because the paralegal cannot give legal advice, any client communication should explain the new evidence factually and tell Ruiz that counsel will discuss options, including a possible continuance. Do not tell the client the case is stronger or weaker and do not advise whether to accept a continuance. Send the prosecutor a written confirmation of receipt and a request to preserve all related materials. The file should reflect that the defense did not sit on its rights and that any delay was caused by the late disclosure.