Solar Project Sequencing at GreenVolt
GreenVolt is developing a 120 MW solar farm on 300 hectares of degraded pasture in a rural region. The land is leased from three farmers. The environmental impact assessment found a population of a threatened lizard in a 12-hectare patch and that construction would cause 18 months of heavy truck traffic. Local residents support the project, but a nearby Indigenous community says the project overlaps a cultural landscape and has not been consulted. The grid connection has been delayed by 9 months, and the fixed-price PPA starts in 14 months. Module prices have risen 22% since financial close. The company has a 10% contingency and a lender covenant requiring completion within 24 months. The project director wants to start construction immediately on the full site to meet the PPA deadline.
1. Identify and prioritize the top risks facing the project.
Read the worked answer
Use a likelihood-impact matrix. The highest risks are the PPA deadline, the unresolved Indigenous consultation, and the grid delay. The PPA creates penalty or default exposure if completion slips. The consultation gap creates legal, reputational, and social-license risk that can stop the project. The 9-month grid delay may already make the 14-month PPA start unrealistic.
Next are biodiversity loss in the 12-hectare lizard patch and cost overrun from the 22% module price increase against a 10% contingency. Truck traffic is a community and permitting risk.
Prioritize the risks that can halt the project: consultation and PPA schedule. Cost and biodiversity are serious but more manageable through redesign and budgeting.
2. Should GreenVolt start construction immediately on the full site? Recommend a sequencing approach.
Read the worked answer
No. Starting on the full site before consultation and biodiversity redesign increases legal challenge, habitat harm, and stranded-cost risk. Use a stage-gate approach.
First, complete culturally appropriate Indigenous consultation and seek free, prior, and informed consent. Redesign the layout to avoid the lizard habitat, with buffers and monitoring. Reassess the grid connection and negotiate a PPA extension or adjust the schedule. Update the budget for the 22% module increase and test the contingency.
Only then start construction on non-sensitive areas. A short delay is preferable to a stop-work order or lawsuit. The project director's schedule pressure is understandable, but full-site construction is not the risk-minimizing choice.
3. Propose stakeholder engagement and biodiversity mitigation measures.
Read the worked answer
Engage the Indigenous community early and at senior level, using culturally appropriate methods and documenting how concerns shape the design. Discuss cultural landscape impacts, access, benefits, and monitoring. Do not treat consultation as a one-off meeting.
For biodiversity, avoid the 12-hectare patch, establish buffers, and monitor the lizard population. If residual impacts remain, use offsets and adaptive management. For residents, manage truck routes, hours, dust, and local hiring.
Report commitments to the lender and track them. The reasoning is that social license and biodiversity performance are project risks, not public-relations extras. Early engagement and avoidance are cheaper than conflict and redesign.