Ambivalence, Cancellations, and Requests Outside Scope
Andre, 45, was told by his physician to lose weight after a prediabetes diagnosis with an HbA1c of 6.2%. He booked three sessions "for his wife" and says he does not like gyms. He has canceled two of four scheduled sessions, arrives late when he does come, and says, "Just tell me what to do and I'll do it." He asks you to write him a meal plan and to sell him a fat burner he saw online. He also mentions that he has a history of binge eating after restrictive diets. He is polite but skeptical and has not set a goal beyond "getting the doctor off my back."
1. Where is Andre in the stages of change, and how should that shape your approach?
Read the worked answer
Andre looks like he is in contemplation, with some action taken because he booked sessions, but his own language says the change is not yet his. "For his wife" and "getting the doctor off my back" are external motivations. Cancellations and lateness are consistent with ambivalence rather than rudeness.
What that means:
- A prescriptive "here is your plan" approach is likely to increase resistance, especially because he has already failed restrictive diets.
- I would use motivational interviewing: open questions, affirmations, reflections, and summaries. For example, "What would need to be different for this to be worth your time?"
- I would explore the good and not-so-good sides of changing and not changing, without trying to convince him.
- I would reduce the commitment to something small, such as two short sessions per week or a 10-minute walk, rather than a full program.
Reasoning: The goal is not to make him obedient. It is to help him articulate a reason that belongs to him. If he remains uninterested, forcing a program is a poor use of his time and mine. I would keep the door open and document the conversation.
2. How do you respond to the meal-plan request and the supplement request within your scope?
Read the worked answer
I would separate the two requests and answer both directly.
Meal plan: I do not prescribe individualized meal plans, especially for someone with prediabetes and a history of binge eating after restriction. That history makes a rigid plan potentially harmful. I would refer him to a registered dietitian who can assess eating patterns and screen for disordered eating. My role is to support behavior change, not to replace medical nutrition therapy.
Fat burner: I would not sell or recommend it. I am not in a position to evaluate its safety, interactions, or contamination risk, and selling supplements creates a conflict of interest. I would tell him to discuss it with his physician or pharmacist and explain that the evidence for most fat burners is weak.
Tone: I would avoid shaming him for asking. A useful response is: "I can help you build a routine and talk with your dietitian about eating. I can't prescribe a meal plan or sell supplements, and here is why."
Reasoning: Scope and conflict-of-interest rules protect the client. Referring out is not rejecting him; it is giving him the right professional for each question.
3. What would you do in the first two sessions to build adherence without colluding with a crash-diet approach?
Read the worked answer
I would focus on attendance, autonomy, and small experiments rather than on weight loss numbers.
Session 1:
- Ask what he wants his health to make possible, not what the physician wants.
- Acknowledge that he has shown up despite skepticism.
- Offer two or three options for a first step, such as a 10-minute walk after dinner twice weekly or one short resistance session.
- Agree on one measurable action for the next week and ask how confident he is that he can do it on a 0–10 scale. If confidence is low, shrink the action.
Session 2:
- Review what happened without judgment. If he canceled, ask what got in the way.
- Problem-solve one barrier, such as time, travel, or discomfort in gyms.
- Keep the plan short enough that it does not feel like another restrictive diet.
- Revisit the dietitian referral and check whether he followed up.
Reasoning: Adherence is built through repeated successful experiences and a sense of choice. A crash-diet plan might produce short-term weight loss but would likely repeat the binge-restrict cycle and damage trust. I would document his goals, referrals, and attendance pattern.