New Thoracic Pain and a Remote Cancer History: Imaging Decisions
A 61-year-old woman presents 10 days after starting a new high-intensity interval class with acute mid-thoracic pain. There was no fall or direct trauma. The pain is present at rest, wakes her most nights, and is not relieved by changing position. She has a history of stage II breast cancer 9 years ago treated with lumpectomy, radiation, and 5 years of tamoxifen; she was discharged from oncology 3 years ago. Neurologic examination is normal, with no lower-extremity weakness, sensory loss, or bowel/bladder change. She asks for 'an X-ray today so you can adjust me.'
1. Evaluate her request for a thoracic radiograph today. Would you order it, and what are the limits of that study in this situation?
Read the worked answer
Her request reflects reasonable concern, but ordering a plain radiograph and then adjusting if it is normal would be unsafe reasoning. She has red flags: a history of breast cancer, new pain after age 50, pain at rest, and nocturnal pain. That combination warrants imaging and medical evaluation, but the choice of study matters. Plain radiographs can miss early lytic or blastic metastatic lesions because substantial bone loss is needed before a lesion is visible, and they do not evaluate the spinal cord or soft tissues.
I would not use a normal radiograph as clearance for manipulation. If advanced imaging is readily available, MRI of the thoracic spine is more sensitive for metastasis, marrow replacement, and cord or nerve root involvement; CT is an alternative if MRI is contraindicated. A radiograph may be a reasonable initial study only if it is the fastest available route and does not delay definitive evaluation. Because she has no neurologic deficit, this is urgent rather than emergent, but she should be evaluated promptly.
2. Describe your imaging and referral plan, including timeframe and contingency if she refuses.
Read the worked answer
I would contact her primary care physician or oncology team the same day and explain the red-flag presentation, requesting urgent advanced imaging of the thoracic spine. If I cannot reach them promptly, I would arrange an urgent care or emergency department evaluation depending on symptom severity; with normal neurology, an urgent outpatient pathway is acceptable, but not a routine 4-week appointment. I would not adjust the thoracic spine in the interim.
If she refuses referral, I would explain that a normal radiograph would not rule out cancer spread and that my concern is not the muscular pain alone. I would document the discussion, her refusal, and the precautions given: new leg weakness, numbness in the saddle area, bowel or bladder dysfunction, unexplained fever, or severe unremitting pain should prompt emergency evaluation. I would offer a follow-up call and would not provide manipulative treatment for the thoracic pain until she has been medically evaluated.
3. How would you document this visit so the record supports your decision if the radiograph is normal?
Read the worked answer
I would document the specific red flags rather than a vague impression: prior breast cancer with treatment dates, new thoracic pain at rest, nocturnal awakening, age over 50, and the absence of neurologic deficit. I would record the examination findings, including a normal neurologic screen and any thoracic tenderness, and state that the presentation is not consistent with simple mechanical pain alone.
I would document my rationale for referral: plain films have limited sensitivity for metastatic disease and cannot exclude cord or soft-tissue involvement; therefore a normal radiograph would not clear her for manipulation. I would include the referral destination, time of contact, and who accepted the referral. I would also record the patient's request for an X-ray and my explanation, the shared decision, and the return precautions. If she declined, I would document informed refusal. This makes clear that the decision was based on the red-flag pattern, not on a negative test.