NBCOT OTR study materials
NBCOT OTR study resources

Post-Stroke Day 2: What Can You Actually Evaluate?

NBCOT OTR · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Post-Stroke Day 2: What Can You Actually Evaluate?

Mr. R is a 68-year-old on hospital day 2 after a left middle cerebral artery infarct. His chart shows an NIHSS fluctuating between 9 and 14, dense right hemiparesis, global aphasia, and atrial fibrillation on a newly started anticoagulant. The order reads: 'OT evaluation and standardized cognitive assessment; family requests discharge to home.' When you arrive, Mr. R opens his eyes to voice but follows no commands and drifts off mid-sentence; his daughter says he 'was fine yesterday.' The unit is short-staffed, and his nurse asks if you can 'just get the eval done so placement can move forward.'

1. What will you actually do at the bedside this session, and how will you document it?

Read the worked answer

Reasoning: A score or assistance level produced under these conditions would be an artifact, not data.

  • Fluctuating arousal plus a changing NIHSS suggests an evolving medical picture (worsening stroke, delirium, infection) - not a stable baseline to measure.
  • Global aphasia makes verbally mediated testing invalid, and anticoagulation plus hemiparesis raises bleeding/fall risk during any handling.
  • The request to 'just get it done' is a workflow pressure, not a clinical indication.

Do: chart review; interview the nurse and daughter for premorbid function and today's baseline; attempt a brief structured observation (arousal, visual tracking, response to voice, tolerance of sitting); screen for delirium (acute onset, fluctuating course, inattention) using collateral and observation; monitor vitals and stop at any sign of distress.

Document: 'Evaluation limited by medical instability and fluctuating arousal'; specific observed behaviors; time spent; why you stopped; precautions (anticoagulation, positioning of the hemiplegic limb); interim recommendations (positioning, pressure relief, family education); and a plan to re-attempt when stable. Do not record an assistance level you did not observe.

2. The physician wants a standardized cognitive score in the chart before tomorrow's team conference. How do you handle that request?

Read the worked answer

Reasoning: A standardized score is only interpretable if the client could meet the test's administration demands. Mr. R cannot sustain attention over a testing session and cannot process verbal directions. A number placed in the chart will be read as a fact about his cognition and used to decide placement - while actually reflecting aphasia, fatigue, and instability.

Response:

  1. Contact the physician directly (not just a chart note) and state plainly: 'I cannot obtain a valid score today; here is what I can report right now.'
  2. Offer what is defensible: serial observation of arousal and attention, functional participation in grooming or positioning, delirium screening, and collateral report.
  3. Name the plan: re-attempt when arousal is stable; at that point use non-verbal or performance-based measures rather than verbally loaded ones; coordinate with speech-language pathology for aphasia-inclusive communication assessment.
  4. Document the rationale so the next clinician does not simply repeat an invalid administration.

Saying 'no score today' with a reason and a plan is stronger clinically and legally than a number nobody can defend.

3. The daughter insists her father is going home. What is your response, and what do you set in motion over the next 48 hours?

Read the worked answer

Reasoning: Day 2 of a fluctuating stroke is too early for anyone to predict destination. The daughter's statement is not an obstacle to manage; it is information about the family's values and a motivator for discharge planning.

Response:

  • Acknowledge the goal without endorsing a timeline: 'Home may well be the plan - right now we do not have enough stable information to say what home would need to look like.'
  • Reframe around requirements rather than verdicts: safety with transfers, medication management, supervision, equipment, and who is available during the day.
  • Gather home information now: layout, stairs, bathroom, who can check in, transportation.
  • Invite her to observe or join a session so goals are shared and she sees the day-to-day variability.
  • Refer to social work/case management for the options discussion (inpatient rehab, SNF, home with services) so the family is not hearing a single recommendation from you.
  • Re-evaluate as the medical picture stabilizes and let the recommendation follow the data.

Do not promise home, and do not foreclose it.