NBME CBSE study materials
NBME CBSE study resources

Stage 4 CKD, Hyperkalemia, and a Medication List That Needs Editing

NBME CBSE · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Stage 4 CKD, Hyperkalemia, and a Medication List That Needs Editing

A 55-year-old man with diabetic kidney disease returns for follow-up. His eGFR is 22 mL/min/1.73 m², down from 30 one year ago, and his urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio is 1,200 mg/g. Medications are lisinopril 20 mg daily, spironolactone 25 mg daily, ibuprofen 600 mg three times daily for chronic knee pain, metformin 1,000 mg twice daily, and atorvastatin 40 mg daily. Blood pressure is 142/86 mmHg. Today's labs: potassium 5.6 mEq/L, bicarbonate 20 mEq/L, hemoglobin 10.2 g/dL. He feels well, has no dyspnea, edema, or chest pain, and an ECG shows a normal QRS with no peaked T waves. He asks whether he is "close to dialysis."

1. Which medications require action today, and which one should NOT be reflexively stopped?

Read the worked answer

Stop or change now:

  • Ibuprofen - the highest-yield intervention. NSAIDs cause afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction, worsen AKI-on-CKD, bloat potassium, blunt the antihypertensive effect of the ACE inhibitor, and cause fluid retention. Chronic use at this eGFR is untenable.
  • Spironolactone - a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist layered on an ACE inhibitor in a patient with eGFR 22 and K⁺ 5.6 mEq/L is a predictable cause of hyperkalemia. Stop it.
  • Metformin - contraindicated at eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² because of lactic acidosis risk, especially with a bicarbonate of 20 mEq/L.

Do not reflexively stop:

  • Lisinopril. ACE inhibition is his best available kidney and cardiovascular protection given albuminuria of 1,200 mg/g. The sequence matters: remove the NSAID and the MRA first, counsel on dietary potassium, add a potassium binder, and recheck in 1–2 weeks. If K⁺ remains >5.5 despite that, reduce the dose or accept a partial reduction rather than abandoning the drug outright. A creatinine rise up to ~30% after ACE-inhibitor initiation or dose change is expected and not a reason to stop.
  • Atorvastatin is appropriate and should continue; cardiovascular risk is his dominant mortality risk.

2. How should the potassium of 5.6 mEq/L be managed in this outpatient, asymptomatic patient, and what would make you escalate?

Read the worked answer

This is chronic, non-emergent hyperkalemia in a patient with a normal ECG and no symptoms, so the treatment is a sustained-lowering strategy rather than an emergency protocol.

  • No IV calcium, no acute insulin/glucose or albuterol - those are for hyperkalemia with ECG changes or K⁺ roughly >6.5 mEq/L, and their effect is transient.
  • Remove the offending agents (above), which alone may resolve it.
  • Dietary potassium counseling with a renal dietitian.
  • Potassium binder - patiromer or sodium zirconium cyclosilicate - to allow continued renin-angiotensin blockade. This is the key modern move: the binder exists so the ACE inhibitor does not have to be sacrificed.
  • Address the metabolic acidosis (bicarbonate 20 mEq/L); correcting acidosis reduces potassium and may slow CKD progression. A loop diuretic is useful only if there is volume overload, which he does not have.
  • Recheck potassium and creatinine in 1–2 weeks.

Escalate to urgent evaluation/ECG if K⁺ rises above ~6.0–6.5, if the ECG shows peaked T waves or QRS widening, or if he develops weakness or palpitations. Refractory hyperkalemia despite these measures is itself an indication for kidney replacement therapy.

3. How should you answer "am I close to dialysis?", and what determines the timing?

Read the worked answer

Answer honestly and with structure, because the answer is 'not yet, but we should start preparing.'

Why not yet:

  • Dialysis is started for a clinical indication, not an eGFR number. The accepted triggers are refractory hyperkalemia, refractory acidosis, volume overload unresponsive to diuretics, uremic pericarditis or encephalopathy, and some toxin poisonings. He currently has none - he is asymptomatic without edema.
  • His eGFR of 22 is stage 4, not stage 5, and the trajectory (30 → 22 over a year) may partly reflect the NSAID and volume rather than pure progression.

What determines timing and preparation:

  • The kidney failure risk equation gives a 2- and 5-year probability of needing replacement therapy; it is more informative than eGFR alone and is used to time referral and access planning.
  • Referral to nephrology (already indicated at eGFR <30, and driven by KFRE risk) and education about modality choice - hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, conservative management - plus transplant evaluation.
  • Vascular access planning should begin roughly when eGFR falls below ~15 or when 2-year risk is high, because a fistula needs months to mature.
  • Address modifiable accelerants now: NSAID cessation, glycemic and blood pressure control, avoiding nephrotoxins and contrast where possible, and treating his anemia of CKD.