NBPTS AYA PE study materials
NBPTS AYA PE study resources

NBPTS AYA PE: Professionalism, Advocacy, and Collaboration

NBPTS AYA PE · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Professionalism, Advocacy, and Collaboration

Domain 4 tests professionalism, advocacy, and collaboration as part of the physical educator's role. The exam expects you to show how you use evidence, ethics, and relationships to strengthen programs and student outcomes.

Professionalism

  • The NBPTS Five Core Propositions frame accomplished teaching: commitment to students and learning, knowledge of subject and pedagogy, responsibility for managing and monitoring learning, systematic reflection, and membership in a learning community.
  • Maintain confidentiality, follow mandatory reporting, model ethical behavior, and keep professional boundaries, including on social media.
  • Use reflective practice and evidence such as student data, observation, and feedback to improve instruction. Participate in professional learning communities and stay current with research and policy.

Advocacy

Advocacy is planned and evidence-based. Show the value of physical education and physical literacy using data: MVPA, fitness and skill outcomes, attendance, behavior, and family feedback. Connect to whole-school physical activity, such as a Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program, and present to administrators or school boards with clear asks.

Collaboration

Work with families, classroom teachers, special educators, nurses, counselors, and community organizations. Collaboration should be reciprocal: share goals, define roles, and protect student privacy. Interdisciplinary units, activity breaks, and transition planning are practical examples.

Worked example

A district proposes cutting middle school PE to add test-prep time. The teacher collects three years of FitnessGram trends, student survey data, and schedules of activity breaks, then presents to the school board with colleagues and families. The proposal asks for a pilot, not a permanent restoration. Reasoning: the case uses multiple sources of evidence, involves stakeholders, and makes a feasible, student-centered request rather than an emotional complaint.

Traps

Do not treat advocacy as complaining or as public relations only; do not rely on a single data source; do not collaborate only with other PE teachers; do not breach confidentiality in advocacy stories; and do not assume families share your cultural assumptions about physical activity.