Due Diligence Deadline and Inspection Findings
On March 1, a buyer and seller sign the NC Offer to Purchase and Contract (Standard Form 2-T) for a $385,000 house. The buyer pays a $2,500 due diligence fee directly to the seller and deposits $6,000 earnest money with the listing firm. The due diligence period expires March 31 at 5:00 p.m., and closing is set for April 30. The seller gives the buyer the Residential Property and Owners' Association Disclosure Statement on March 10. On March 28, a home inspector reports foundation cracks; a structural engineer later estimates an $18,000 repair. The buyer's agent receives the engineer's report on March 30 but cannot reach the buyer, who is traveling. On April 2, the buyer signs a termination notice and the agent emails it that afternoon. The seller refuses to refund the earnest money and keeps the due diligence fee, saying the buyer knew about the cracks and missed the deadline. The buyer demands both amounts back, arguing the seller should have disclosed the foundation problem.
1. Was the buyer entitled to terminate and recover the earnest money on April 2? Explain the contract mechanics and the result for each deposit.
Read the worked answer
No, not under the standard form's due diligence right. The buyer's unlimited right to terminate exists only until 5:00 p.m. on the due diligence date. April 2 is after March 31, so the April 2 notice is ineffective as a due diligence termination. The $2,500 due diligence fee is generally nonrefundable and is earned by the seller when paid, except if the seller breaches; the buyer's later change of mind does not create a refund. The $6,000 earnest money is refundable only if the buyer terminates during the due diligence period or the seller breaches. Because the buyer did not timely terminate and apparently has no seller breach, the seller may retain the earnest money as liquidated damages under the contract if the buyer fails to close. The disclosure argument is weak without evidence the seller knew of the cracks and concealed them; a later inspection finding is not automatically a seller breach.
2. If the agent had emailed a signed termination on March 30, how would the outcome change, and what role would the disclosure statement play?
Read the worked answer
A timely written termination before the deadline would end the contract and require return of the earnest money. The due diligence fee would still stay with the seller. The disclosure statement does not extend the due diligence deadline; the buyer already had the statement. A separate disclosure-based termination right could arise only if the seller failed to provide the statement or if the statement was inaccurate and the buyer can show knowledge and material misrepresentation. The key is the contract deadline, not the receipt of the inspection report.
3. What should the buyer's agent have done differently after receiving the engineer's report on March 30?
Read the worked answer
The agent should have treated the deadline as critical: immediately notify the buyer in writing, explain that written termination must be delivered before 5:00 p.m. on March 31, and document the delivery method allowed by the contract. The agent cannot sign for the buyer or make the decision, but can prepare the termination form, confirm the exact deadline and delivery instructions, and keep evidence of attempts. Waiting for the buyer to return on April 2 was the error. If the buyer wanted to preserve rights, the notice needed to be signed and delivered before expiration; after that, the agent should negotiate a mutual release or seller concession, not assume a refund.