The Mole and the Kit She Brought
A 52-year-old client books a brow wax, a 30% glycolic peel, and makeup application at a day spa. Her intake form shows she began isotretinoin three months ago and expects two more months of treatment. She had a chemical peel at another salon ten days ago and is still flaking around her mouth. On her left cheek is an 8 mm mole that she says "has gotten darker and ragged this year." She wants the esthetician to cover it with concealer and asks her to "burn off" two skin tags using a kit she brought, saying a friend did it successfully. She has a wedding in three days and wants to look "smooth." The esthetician is licensed and working alone in the spa that afternoon.
1. Of the three booked services, which can proceed today and which must be declined? Give your reasoning.
Read the worked answer
Decline the brow wax. Isotretinoin thins and fragilizes the epidermis for months after the last dose; waxing can avulse skin along with the hair. Add a peel ten days ago and active flaking around the mouth, and the barrier is already compromised.
Decline the peel. Recent chemical exfoliation plus visible flaking means the skin has not finished remodeling. A 30% glycolic peel on top of that is a burn waiting to happen, and isotretinoin magnifies penetration and irritation.
The makeup application can proceed with care: patch-test any product on a small area, use clean brushes or disposables, and keep pressure light over the flaking areas.
The pattern to apply: the more aggressive the exfoliation the service involves, the more absolute the isotretinoin contraindication. Confirm clearance with her prescriber before any future waxing or peeling, and document the request for that clearance.
2. She hands over the kit and asks the esthetician to remove the skin tags. How should this be handled, in words and in the record?
Read the worked answer
Decline clearly and without hedging. Removing skin lesions - by freezing, burning, cutting, or chemical cautery - is the practice of medicine, not cosmetology. A purchased kit does not move it inside the esthetician's scope, and "a friend did it" is not a credential.
Say it plainly: "I'm not licensed to remove skin growths, and using a home kit could scar or infect you. I can show you how to cover them with makeup today, and I'd recommend a dermatologist look at them."
In the record: note that the client requested lesion removal with a client-supplied kit, that the esthetician declined as outside scope, that the product was not used, and that referral was given. Keep the kit out of the treatment room.
3. What is the esthetician's obligation regarding the changing mole, and how should the conversation go without overstepping?
Read the worked answer
An esthetician does not diagnose, but does have a duty to refer. A lesion that has changed color and border over a year is exactly the kind of finding that warrants a medical look, and the client has already noticed it herself.
- Describe, don't label: "I've noticed you mentioned this has changed. I'm not able to evaluate it, but I'd encourage you to have a dermatologist look at it soon."
- Do not say "that's cancer" and do not say "it's nothing."
- Do not build the makeup service around hiding it from a partner or from herself; concealing it cosmetically is fine, but concealment should not delay the referral.
- Write the observation, the referral, and the client's response in the record, and give her the referral in writing.
If the client refuses the referral, note that too - the documentation protects both parties and keeps the decision with the client.