I85PREP
⌘ K
NC POST study materials
NC POST study resources

NC POST practice questions

One question at a time. Build your NC POST understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

In North Carolina, an officer may briefly detain a person for investigation without a warrant when the officer has which of the following?

  1. probable cause to believe a felony has been committed
  2. voluntary consent from the person to be detained
  3. an unparticularized hunch that criminal activity is afoot
  4. reasonable suspicion based on specific and articulable facts Correct answer.

Explanation

An investigative detention requires reasonable suspicion, meaning specific and articulable facts that would lead a reasonable officer to believe criminal activity is occurring or has occurred. Probable cause is a higher standard required for arrest, not for a brief stop.

Question 2Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

Which statement best describes probable cause to arrest?

  1. An uncorroborated tip provided by a named citizen informant
  2. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed the offense
  3. A hunch that is confirmed by the officer's training and experience
  4. Facts that would lead a reasonable person to believe an offense occurred Correct answer.

Explanation

Probable cause is measured by the totality of the circumstances known to the officer and asks whether a reasonable person would believe an offense has been or is being committed. It does not require certainty or proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

Question 3Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

An officer's use of force during a seizure is judged by which constitutional standard?

  1. whether the department's written policy authorizes that technique
  2. the subjective intent of the officer at the moment force was applied
  3. whether the suspect was later found to have been unarmed
  4. objective reasonableness judged from a reasonable officer's perspective Correct answer.

Explanation

Force is evaluated under the Fourth Amendment for objective reasonableness, considering the severity of the crime, the immediate threat posed, and whether the suspect was resisting or fleeing. The officer's subjective beliefs are not the test.

Question 4Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

During booking, an officer asks an arrestee his name, date of birth, and address without first giving Miranda warnings. How should this questioning be treated?

  1. impermissible unless the questions relate to the charged offense
  2. permissible only if the arrestee has already waived counsel
  3. permissible because routine booking questions are not interrogation Correct answer.
  4. impermissible because all questioning after arrest requires warnings

Explanation

Miranda applies to custodial interrogation, and routine booking questions used for identification and processing are not considered interrogation. Answers to such questions are generally admissible even without warnings.

Question 5Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

An inventory search of an impounded vehicle is valid when it is conducted in which manner?

  1. for the purpose of finding evidence of the offense of arrest
  2. only after officers obtain a search warrant
  3. only in areas visible from outside the vehicle
  4. according to standardized written procedures Correct answer.

Explanation

Inventory searches are permissible because they serve administrative purposes such as protecting property and officer safety, but they must follow standardized criteria rather than officer discretion.

Question 6Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

A protective frisk during a lawful investigative stop is generally limited to what?

  1. a search of the passenger compartment of nearby vehicles
  2. a pat-down of the outer clothing for weapons Correct answer.
  3. a search of the person's pockets for contraband of any kind
  4. a full search of the person's clothing and belongings

Explanation

A frisk is limited to a pat-down of outer clothing to detect weapons that could endanger the officer. If the pat-down reveals an object that feels like a weapon by plain touch, the officer may remove it.

Question 7Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

What is the primary purpose of the exclusionary rule?

  1. to ensure that only reliable evidence is presented at trial
  2. to compensate victims of unlawful police conduct
  3. to punish individual officers for unconstitutional conduct
  4. to deter future violations of constitutional rights by police Correct answer.

Explanation

The exclusionary rule bars evidence obtained through constitutional violations in order to deter police misconduct. It is not designed to punish specific officers or to compensate injured parties.

Question 8Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

A suspect drops a bag of narcotics and runs as officers approach. Officers may lawfully seize the bag because of which reason?

  1. officers had a search warrant for the suspect's person
  2. flight alone always supplies probable cause to search
  3. the bag was in plain view inside a protected area
  4. abandoned property is not protected by the Fourth Amendment Correct answer.

Explanation

Property that has been abandoned is not subject to Fourth Amendment protection, so its seizure does not require a warrant or probable cause. Flight may contribute to reasonable suspicion but is not itself a search authority.

Question 9Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

Officers arrest a driver for driving while license revoked, handcuff him, and place him in a patrol car. Under current Fourth Amendment doctrine, may they search the passenger compartment?

  1. Yes, because the arrest took place while the arrestee was in the vehicle
  2. No, unless the arrestee first gives a voluntary consent to search
  3. No, unless evidence of the offense or a weapon is likely within reach Correct answer.
  4. Yes, because a search incident to arrest always extends to the entire passenger compartment

Explanation

A vehicle search incident to arrest is permitted only when the arrestee is unsecured and within reaching distance of the compartment, or when it is reasonable to believe evidence of the offense of arrest is inside. Once the arrestee is handcuffed and secured, neither justification applies here.

Question 10Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

Officers have probable cause to believe a parked car contains illegal firearms but do not have a warrant. What may they do under the automobile exception?

  1. search only areas within the immediate reach of the driver
  2. search the car without a warrant Correct answer.
  3. search the car only after it has been towed to a secure facility
  4. search the car only with the registered owner's consent on scene

Explanation

The automobile exception allows a warrantless search of a vehicle when officers have probable cause to believe it contains contraband or evidence, because vehicles are readily mobile. The scope extends to containers within the vehicle that may hold the object of the search.

Question 11Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

A parent who shares a residence with an adult child consents to a search of a closet in their common hallway. How should the consent be treated?

  1. valid, only if the parent is the legal owner of the residence
  2. valid, because the parent had common authority over the shared space Correct answer.
  3. invalid, because a third party can never consent to a search
  4. invalid, because only the owner of the property may consent

Explanation

A third party with common authority over shared premises may give valid consent to search those areas. Authority rests on mutual use and joint access, not on record title.

Question 12Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

Officers chasing a fleeing felony suspect see him enter a friend's apartment without permission. What may the officers lawfully do?

  1. enter only if they first announce that a warrant already exists
  2. not enter without a warrant under any circumstances
  3. enter only after securing written consent from the friend
  4. enter the apartment to continue the pursuit without a warrant Correct answer.

Explanation

Hot pursuit is a recognized exigent circumstance that permits warrantless entry into a dwelling to prevent a suspect's escape or to protect the public. The entry must be reasonably connected to the pursuit.

Question 13Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

An unlawful arrest leads officers to a witness who then provides evidence of the crime. How is that evidence generally treated?

  1. automatically admissible, because the witness was never a suspect
  2. admissible, because evidence from a witness is never derivative
  3. inadmissible only if the officers acted in bad faith
  4. presumptively inadmissible as fruit of an unlawful arrest Correct answer.

Explanation

Evidence derived from an unlawful seizure is presumptively excluded under the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. The presumption can be overcome only if the connection to the illegality is broken, for example by attenuation.

Question 14Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

During a lawful traffic stop, an officer orders the driver and passengers to step out of the vehicle. What justifies this order?

  1. occupants of a lawfully stopped vehicle are always subject to arrest
  2. the officer must first develop reasonable suspicion that they are armed
  3. the stop automatically authorizes a full search of the occupants
  4. officer safety justifies the order during a lawful traffic stop Correct answer.

Explanation

Once a vehicle has been lawfully stopped, officers may order the driver and passengers out as a routine safety measure without any additional suspicion. The order to exit is a minimal intrusion weighed against officer safety.

Question 15Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

A suspect has been formally charged with robbery. Before placing him in a lineup, what must police do?

  1. provide counsel, since the Sixth Amendment right has attached Correct answer.
  2. give the suspect fresh Miranda warnings before the lineup
  3. obtain a warrant authorizing the lineup procedure
  4. have the suspect sign a written waiver of identification procedures

Explanation

The Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches at the initiation of adversary judicial proceedings and applies to post-charge identification procedures such as lineups. An uncounseled post-charge lineup is subject to suppression.

Question 16Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

An officer may use deadly force against a fleeing suspect only under which circumstance?

  1. the suspect flees from a lawful investigative stop
  2. probable cause exists that the suspect poses a threat of serious harm Correct answer.
  3. the suspect refuses repeated loud commands to stop
  4. the suspect is wanted for a property crime involving a large financial loss

Explanation

Deadly force to prevent escape is permitted only where the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to officers or others. Fleeing a stop or committing a property offense does not meet that threshold.

Question 17Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

A private citizen makes a lawful citizen's arrest in North Carolina. What must the citizen do next?

  1. release the person immediately unless the citizen posts a cash bond
  2. deliver the person to a magistrate or officer without unnecessary delay Correct answer.
  3. transport the person directly to the county jail for booking
  4. hold the person in custody until an arrest warrant can be obtained

Explanation

North Carolina law requires a private person who has made an arrest to take the arrested person before a magistrate or a law enforcement officer without unnecessary delay. The citizen has no authority to hold the person indefinitely or to set conditions of release.

Question 18Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

An anonymous tip reports that a driver is carrying drugs in his car. Courts evaluate the tip under the totality-of-the-circumstances test, which asks whether what is true?

  1. the tip was recorded in writing and signed
  2. the informant has a perfect record of reliability
  3. the tip as a whole is reliable enough to support probable cause Correct answer.
  4. the informant's basis of knowledge alone establishes probable cause

Explanation

Under the totality-of-the-circumstances approach, a court weighs the informant's veracity, reliability, and basis of knowledge together rather than any single factor in isolation. Corroboration by police can supply the missing reliability.

Question 19Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

Which of the following is constitutionally protected curtilage of a home?

  1. A public sidewalk that runs past the front of the house
  2. A fenced side yard next to the house used for family cookouts Correct answer.
  3. An open field located one hundred yards behind the house, unfenced
  4. A shared parking lot used by the entire neighborhood

Explanation

Curtilage is the area immediately surrounding a dwelling that is used for intimate activities of the home. Factors include proximity to the house, enclosure, use, and steps taken to exclude others.

Question 20Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

Officers with probable cause to believe a suspect committed a felony see him walking on a public sidewalk. Under Fourth Amendment precedent, what may they do?

  1. arrest him only if the felony was committed in the officer's presence
  2. detain him briefly but not arrest him without a warrant
  3. arrest him without a warrant because he is in a public place Correct answer.
  4. arrest him only after obtaining an arrest warrant from a magistrate

Explanation

The Fourth Amendment does not require a warrant for an arrest carried out in a public place when the officer has probable cause. The public setting reduces the privacy interest that a home entry would implicate.

Question 21Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

After completing the purpose of a traffic stop, an officer keeps the driver on scene several extra minutes to await a drug dog. Under Supreme Court precedent, the extension is unlawful unless which is true?

  1. the driver consented to the longer stop by producing a license
  2. the dog arrived before the officer finished writing the citation
  3. the stop took place on an interstate highway inside the county
  4. reasonable suspicion of criminal activity justifies the extension Correct answer.

Explanation

A stop may not be prolonged beyond the time reasonably required to complete its mission absent reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. The critical question is whether the extension was justified, not whether a citation had been completed.

Question 22Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

Officers arrest a suspect in a supermarket and, before giving any warnings, ask where he hid his loaded gun. How should the suspect's answer be treated?

  1. inadmissible, because questions about weapons always require counsel
  2. inadmissible, because any question after arrest requires prior warnings
  3. admissible under the public safety exception Correct answer.
  4. admissible only if the gun is later found in the stated location

Explanation

The public safety exception permits brief questions about a hidden weapon when officers reasonably believe there is an immediate threat to the public or themselves. The exception applies before the warnings are given.

Question 23Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

The Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches at the initiation of what?

  1. adversary judicial proceedings, such as a formal charge Correct answer.
  2. the moment an officer develops probable cause to arrest
  3. any custodial interview conducted by police officers
  4. the moment the suspect invokes his right to remain silent

Explanation

The Sixth Amendment right to counsel becomes active once adversary judicial proceedings have begun, for example by formal charge, indictment, or arraignment. After that point, police may not deliberately elicit statements without counsel present.

Question 24Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

Under North Carolina law, a person who has been arrested must be taken before a magistrate for an initial appearance according to which standard?

  1. without unnecessary delay Correct answer.
  2. within 24 hours of arrest, excluding weekends and holidays
  3. within 72 hours of arrest, including weekends and holidays
  4. only after the district attorney has reviewed the charges

Explanation

North Carolina law requires that an arrested person be brought before a magistrate without unnecessary delay so that probable cause and conditions of release can be addressed promptly. The standard is not a fixed number of hours.

Question 25Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

Under the good faith exception, evidence seized pursuant to a warrant later found defective is generally admissible when which is true?

  1. the warrant was issued by a magistrate rather than a judge
  2. the supporting affidavit was a bare bones statement of suspicion
  3. the officers acted in subjective good faith regardless of objective reasonableness
  4. the officers reasonably relied on the warrant's validity Correct answer.

Explanation

The good faith exception applies when officers objectively and reasonably rely on a warrant later held invalid. Reliance is not reasonable where the supporting affidavit is so lacking in indicia of probable cause that no officer could reasonably rely on it.

Question 26Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

Miranda warnings are required before which type of police questioning?

  1. Routine booking questions asked after arrest
  2. Custodial interrogation about the offense Correct answer.
  3. A voluntary statement the suspect blurts out
  4. A traffic stop question about the driver's destination

Explanation

Miranda applies to custodial interrogation, meaning questioning initiated by officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of freedom in a significant way. Routine booking questions and volunteered statements fall outside the rule. Ordinary traffic stops are generally not custodial for Miranda purposes.

Question 27Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

An officer may conduct a brief investigative stop of a person based on what standard?

  1. A mere hunch based on officer experience
  2. Reasonable suspicion based on specific facts Correct answer.
  3. Clear and convincing evidence of guilt
  4. Probable cause the person committed a crime

Explanation

An investigative stop requires reasonable suspicion, which must be supported by specific and articulable facts rather than an unparticularized hunch. Probable cause and clear and convincing evidence are higher standards than the law requires for a brief stop.

Question 28Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

While lawfully inside a suspect's apartment to arrest him, an officer sees a handgun on a table that matches the description of a weapon used in a recent shooting. What may the officer do?

  1. Seize it because its incriminating character is immediately apparent Correct answer.
  2. Nothing, because the gun was not named in a warrant
  3. Seize it only after leaving to obtain a search warrant
  4. Seize it only if the suspect consents to the seizure

Explanation

Under the plain-view doctrine, an officer lawfully present may seize an item when its incriminating character is immediately apparent. The officer is already lawfully inside the apartment to make the arrest, and the gun's evidentiary value is apparent from its match to the shooting. No separate warrant or consent is required for that seizure.

Question 29Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

During a custodial interrogation, a suspect states, "I want a lawyer." What must the officer do?

  1. Continue questioning until the suspect repeats the request
  2. Ask questions limited to clarifying the request for counsel
  3. Stop only if the suspect refuses to answer the current question
  4. Stop questioning unless counsel is present or the suspect reinitiates Correct answer.

Explanation

Once a suspect unambiguously invokes the right to counsel during custodial interrogation, all questioning must cease. Interrogation may not resume unless counsel is present or the suspect later initiates communication. The request need not be repeated, and the rule is not limited to a refusal to answer a particular question.

Question 30Legal Foundations and Criminal Procedure

Officers arrest a suspect in the living room of his home on a valid warrant. They have no warrant to search the home. Which action is lawful under the protective-sweep doctrine?

  1. A search of the attic for evidence of the crime
  2. A full search of closed drawers throughout the house
  3. A search of the suspect's car parked outside
  4. A quick check of adjacent rooms where an accomplice could be hiding Correct answer.

Explanation

A protective sweep is a quick and limited check of spaces where a person could be hiding and poses a danger to officers. It requires reasonable suspicion that an accomplice or other dangerous person may be present. It does not authorize a full evidence search or a search of unrelated areas such as a parked car.

Question 31Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

During a routine traffic stop on a multi-lane roadway, where should the patrol vehicle normally be positioned?

  1. Directly behind the violator with the bumpers nearly touching
  2. Offset to the left and angled slightly toward the traffic lane Correct answer.
  3. Alongside the driver's door to keep it from opening
  4. About 100 yards behind the violator, out of the traffic lane

Explanation

An offset left position puts the patrol car between the officer and passing traffic, gives the officer cover during the approach, and preserves room to move and observe. Bumper-to-bumper contact eliminates that cover and restricts movement.

Question 32Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

Under Pennsylvania v. Mimms, an officer conducting a lawful traffic stop may:

  1. order the driver out of the vehicle as a routine safety measure Correct answer.
  2. never order the driver out unless an arrest is being made
  3. order the driver out only when the stop rests on probable cause rather than reasonable suspicion
  4. order the driver out only after developing suspicion of a separate crime

Explanation

Mimms held that once a vehicle is lawfully stopped, ordering the driver out is a minimal additional intrusion outweighed by officer safety, so no separate justification is required. The same reasoning extends to passengers under Maryland v. Wilson.

Question 33Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

Reasonable suspicion for an investigative vehicle stop requires:

  1. specific and articulable facts suggesting criminal activity is afoot Correct answer.
  2. an uncorroborated anonymous tip standing alone
  3. a preponderance of the evidence that a crime has occurred
  4. a hunch grounded in the officer's years of experience

Explanation

Reasonable suspicion is a lower standard than probable cause but must rest on specific, articulable facts that an officer can put into words, together with rational inferences drawn from those facts. A bare hunch or an uncorroborated tip does not meet it.

Question 34Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

Before initiating a high-risk vehicle stop, an officer should ordinarily:

  1. activate blue lights at once and close to within one car length
  2. use the siren continuously until the driver pulls over
  3. broadcast the stop only after the occupants are out of the car
  4. wait for backup and assign roles before activating lights Correct answer.

Explanation

A high-risk stop should be a planned, coordinated event with enough personnel to control every occupant and cover every direction. Roles such as contact officer, cover officer, and handcuffing officer are assigned before lights are activated.

Question 35Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

On a routine traffic stop, the officer's first radio transmission should include:

  1. the officer's assessment of the driver's demeanor
  2. location, tag number, and nature of the stop Correct answer.
  3. the driver's full name and date of birth
  4. the citation number assigned to the stop

Explanation

The initial broadcast tells dispatch and other units where the officer is, what vehicle is involved, and why it was stopped, so help can be sent if contact is lost. Driver identity and citation data are gathered later.

Question 36Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

Under Whren v. United States, a traffic stop is lawful when:

  1. the officer first obtains a warrant from a judicial official
  2. the driver is told the real reason for the stop before producing a license
  3. the traffic violation is the officer's sole or primary motive for the stop
  4. probable cause of a traffic violation exists, whatever the officer's actual motive Correct answer.

Explanation

Whren held that the constitutional reasonableness of a traffic stop is judged by whether probable cause of a violation existed, not by the officer's subjective motivation. A stop that would be valid for any officer remains valid even if the officer hopes to find other evidence.

Question 37Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

During a lawful traffic stop, may an officer order passengers out of the vehicle?

  1. Yes; ordering passengers out is a routine safety measure under Maryland v. Wilson Correct answer.
  2. No; passengers may exit only on their own initiative
  3. Yes, but only after every passenger has been frisked
  4. Yes, but only when the stop is for a felony

Explanation

Maryland v. Wilson extended the Mimms rule to passengers, reasoning that the additional intrusion is minimal and the officer-safety interest is the same. No additional suspicion and no frisk are required to order them out.

Question 38Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

An officer stops a car for speeding and finishes writing the citation. Absent reasonable suspicion, the officer:

  1. may hold the driver 20 more minutes for a K-9 unit to arrive
  2. may keep the driver waiting while conducting a full vehicle search
  3. may extend the stop to ask about drugs as long as the driver stays calm
  4. must release the driver without further delay Correct answer.

Explanation

Rodriguez v. United States held that the authority to detain a motorist ends when the tasks tied to the traffic mission are complete, unless reasonable suspicion of other criminal activity arises. The calm demeanor of the driver does not create that suspicion.

Question 39Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

An officer reasonably believes a driver may have a weapon within reach inside the vehicle. The officer may:

  1. search only the driver's person and nothing inside the car
  2. search the passenger compartment for weapons in areas where one could be hidden Correct answer.
  3. search the purses and bags of every occupant
  4. search the entire trunk for weapons

Explanation

Michigan v. Long permits a protective search of the passenger compartment, limited to places where a weapon could be placed or hidden, when there is reasonable suspicion the person is dangerous and may gain immediate control of a weapon. The search is for weapons, not evidence.

Question 40Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

At a high-risk vehicle stop, occupants should be directed to exit:

  1. all at once, with hands raised over their heads
  2. only after each has been handcuffed inside the car
  3. one at a time, walking backward with hands visible Correct answer.
  4. with hands on the roof while officers approach the doors

Explanation

Controlled, one-at-a-time removal lets officers keep track of every hand and prevents occupants from coordinating resistance. Walking backward toward officers keeps hands in view and lets officers maintain a safe distance until handcuffing.

Question 41Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

Approaching a stopped vehicle from the passenger side is most useful when the officer:

  1. believes the driver has already fled the scene on foot
  2. has parked the patrol car in front of the violator
  3. wants to watch the driver's hands without being seen walking up Correct answer.
  4. is stopping a vehicle in a closed parking lot

Explanation

A passenger-side approach keeps the officer out of the adjacent traffic lane, provides surprise, and allows a clear view of the driver's hands and the interior. It is a tactic chosen for observation and safety, not for convenience of parking.

Question 42Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

A sobriety checkpoint is lawful when:

  1. the location is kept secret from the public until it closes
  2. each vehicle is held for at least fifteen minutes
  3. officers select vehicles based on the driver's appearance
  4. neutral criteria govern who is stopped and the operation is planned Correct answer.

Explanation

Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz upheld sobriety checkpoints because the stops followed neutral criteria and served a strong highway-safety interest, with minimal intrusion. Delaware v. Prouse barred random stops left to individual officer discretion.

Question 43Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

Under North Carolina's speeding-to-elude statute (G.S. 20-141.5), the offense is elevated to a felony when:

  1. the driver exceeds the posted limit by any amount
  2. the driver fails to stop at the first opportunity
  3. the officer has activated blue lights and siren
  4. two or more of the listed aggravating factors are present Correct answer.

Explanation

G.S. 20-141.5 makes speeding to elude arrest a misdemeanor and raises it to a felony when at least two statutory aggravating factors apply, such as grossly excessive speed, reckless driving, driving while licensed revoked, or injury to persons or property.

Question 44Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

An officer in a vehicle pursuit should terminate the pursuit when:

  1. the fleeing driver begins changing lanes abruptly
  2. the danger to the public outweighs the need for immediate apprehension Correct answer.
  3. the suspect's vehicle is faster than the patrol car
  4. the pursuit has lasted more than one minute

Explanation

Pursuits are governed by a continuing risk assessment that balances the seriousness of the offense and the need for apprehension against the danger created for the public and the officers. When the risk outweighs the benefit, the pursuit ends regardless of how close the officer is.

Question 45Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

An officer who decides to cite a driver instead of making a custodial arrest may not:

  1. order the driver and passengers out of the car
  2. search the passenger compartment incident to the citation Correct answer.
  3. ask the driver for a license and registration
  4. run a records check on the occupants

Explanation

Knowles v. Iowa held that a search incident to arrest is unavailable when the officer issues a citation in lieu of custodial arrest, because there is no arrestee to control and no risk that evidence will be destroyed. Citation does not authorize a vehicle search.

Question 46Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

A driver consents to a search of the vehicle. The officer may search:

  1. the trunk only if the driver signs a written consent form
  2. only within the scope of what the driver actually agreed to Correct answer.
  3. any area at all, even after the driver withdraws consent
  4. the driver's home if the driver is later driven there

Explanation

Consent defines the boundary of the search: the officer may look only where the driver actually authorized. Consent may be limited or withdrawn at any time, and the search must stop when it is.

Question 47Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

While questioning a driver who has not been asked to step out, the officer should stand:

  1. between the two vehicles, next to the driver's door
  2. in front of the vehicle's left headlight
  3. squarely beside the driver's window, facing the driver
  4. behind the driver's shoulder, clear of the door's swing and reach Correct answer.

Explanation

Standing at the rear of the driver's window keeps the officer out of reach, out of the path of an opening door, and behind cover if the driver produces a weapon. It also allows a view of the driver's hands and the vehicle interior.

Question 48Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

During a lawful traffic stop, a K-9 sniff of the vehicle's exterior:

  1. requires probable cause before it may begin
  2. is not a search, but it may not prolong the stop absent reasonable suspicion Correct answer.
  3. is a full search that requires a warrant
  4. may extend the stop for as long as the handler needs

Explanation

Illinois v. Caballes held that a dog sniff of the exterior of a lawfully stopped vehicle is not a Fourth Amendment search. Rodriguez nonetheless bars using the dog to extend the stop beyond the time the traffic mission requires without reasonable suspicion.

Question 49Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

Force used during a vehicle stop is evaluated by:

  1. the officer's subjective good faith alone
  2. objective reasonableness under the totality of the circumstances Correct answer.
  3. whether the suspect was ultimately charged with a crime
  4. the department's written policy alone

Explanation

Graham v. Connor requires courts to judge force by what a reasonable officer would have done under the totality of the circumstances, including the severity of the offense and the threat posed. Subjective intentions and later charging decisions do not control.

Question 50Patrol Operations and Vehicle Stops

An officer stops a vehicle based on a reasonable but mistaken reading of a traffic statute. Under Heien v. North Carolina, the stop is:

  1. invalid unless the driver actually violated the statute as written
  2. valid if the mistake was objectively reasonable Correct answer.
  3. invalid, because mistakes of law never justify a seizure
  4. valid only if the mistake concerned an observed fact rather than a legal interpretation

Explanation

Heien held that a reasonable mistake of law, like a reasonable mistake of fact, can supply the justification for a stop because the Fourth Amendment asks whether the officer's conduct was objectively reasonable. An unreasonable mistake of law does not save the stop.