Restaurant Fire, Period of Restoration, and Off-Site Equipment
Ambrosia Kitchen, a Charlotte restaurant, carries commercial property coverage with $250,000 building, $150,000 business personal property, 12 months of business income with a 72-hour waiting period, and extra expense. A separate inland marine equipment floater schedules a $40,000 portable generator and a $15,000 catering trailer. A kitchen fire on March 3 forces closure. The health department allows reopening on May 1 only after grease-duct replacement. The owner had a signed April 15 catering contract for $30,000 that was canceled. The insurer pays $80,000 for building and contents but denies business income after April 1, arguing the owner could have reopened sooner and that the canceled catering contract was speculative. The insurer also denies the generator claim because the generator was at a job site, not the restaurant, when the fire occurred. The owner has receipts showing $12,000 in extra expense for renting a temporary kitchen and $9,000 in spoiled food due to a power outage at a storage unit.
1. When should the business-income period of restoration end, and how should the canceled catering contract be treated?
Read the worked answer
Business income. The 72-hour waiting period is satisfied. The period of restoration ends when the property could be repaired with reasonable speed, not when the owner actually reopens. The health department’s May 1 clearance is relevant if grease-duct replacement was necessary to reopen; the insurer must evaluate that delay. The April 15 catering contract is not automatically speculative: a signed contract, deposit, and history can support lost income, but the owner must prove net profit, not gross revenue. The adjuster should obtain the contract, deposit records, prior catering margins, and evidence that the job could not be performed elsewhere.
2. Evaluate the insurer’s denial of the generator claim under the inland marine floater.
Read the worked answer
The equipment floater follows the scheduled generator. A denial based only on the generator being at a job site is weak unless the floater has a location limitation. The adjuster should read the schedule, the territorial scope, and any “temporary use away from premises” clause. Inland marine floaters often cover scheduled property wherever it is used within the policy territory. If the generator was listed and the loss was accidental, the location alone should not defeat coverage. The insurer must cite a specific exclusion or limitation; otherwise the adjuster should demand payment for the scheduled amount, subject to deductible and valuation terms.
3. How should the adjuster present the extra-expense and spoiled-food items?
Read the worked answer
Extra expense. The $12,000 temporary kitchen is classic extra expense to avoid or shorten shutdown. It should be documented as an expense the owner would not have incurred but for the fire, with invoices and the time period tied to the restoration.
Spoilage. The $9,000 spoiled food at an off-premises storage unit is covered only if the policy or spoilage endorsement covers off-premises power outage. Otherwise it is a business-income or property exclusion issue. The adjuster should separate covered, questionable, and unsupported items in the submission so the insurer cannot use one weak item to deny the entire claim.