Self-Neglect, Financial Exploitation Concern, and Decision-Making Capacity
A 74-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and osteoarthritis lives alone in a rent-controlled apartment. Over 4 months she has lost 8 kg (from 68 to 60 kg), has unopened mail, stained clothing, and an empty refrigerator except for canned soup. She missed three primary care appointments and ran out of insulin 3 weeks ago. Her daughter calls the clinic concerned that a neighbor is “taking her money” and that she refuses home care. On exam: BP 148/88, glucose 286 mg/dL, BMI 21, dry mucous membranes, a healing bruise on the left forearm, and mild ankle edema. She is alert, oriented to person, place, and year, and says, “I don’t need help; my daughter just wants my apartment.” She can state the risks of stopping insulin but cannot describe how she would obtain refills or pay for groceries this month.
1. How would you assess decision-making capacity for refusing home care and insulin management?
Read the worked answer
Capacity is decision-specific, not global. Assess the four abilities for the specific decisions in question:
- Understanding: Can she explain that stopping insulin can cause hyperglycemia, dehydration, and hospitalization?
- Appreciation: Does she believe those risks apply to her, not just people in general?
- Reasoning: Can she compare options, such as accepting home nursing versus relying on her daughter or neighbor?
- Expressing a choice: Can she consistently state a choice?
Her ability to state risks of stopping insulin is only one element. Her inability to describe how she would obtain refills or groceries suggests a gap in reasoning or executive function, not necessarily lack of understanding. Use a formal tool if helpful, but the clinical judgment matters most.
Also assess for reversible contributors: depression, delirium, hypoglycemia, medication effects, hearing or vision loss, and cognitive impairment. If capacity is intact, respect her autonomy while addressing risks. If not, identify the surrogate decision-maker under state law and seek the least restrictive support.
2. How do you distinguish self-neglect from elder mistreatment, and what reporting obligations apply?
Read the worked answer
Self-neglect is inability or unwillingness to meet basic needs, without a third party causing harm. Elder mistreatment involves harm by another person: physical, sexual, emotional, financial exploitation, neglect by a caregiver, or abandonment.
Concerning features here:
- Self-neglect: weight loss, empty refrigerator, insulin nonadherence, missed appointments, poor hygiene, and inability to explain how she will obtain food or medications.
- Possible financial exploitation: a neighbor “taking her money,” unopened mail, and the daughter’s concern. Ask directly about money, bank access, and who helps with bills, with permission.
- Physical findings: the healing bruise needs explanation; assess for injury patterns, fear of anyone, and whether she is being coerced.
In most U.S. jurisdictions, clinicians are mandated reporters when they reasonably suspect abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Self-neglect is also reportable in many states. Report to Adult Protective Services based on reasonable suspicion, not proof. Do not investigate by confronting the alleged exploiter. Document findings objectively and the report made. Reporting does not automatically remove her autonomy; APS can arrange services and investigate exploitation.
3. What is your immediate management plan, and what would you do if she has capacity but continues to refuse help?
Read the worked answer
Immediate management:
- Treat dehydration and hyperglycemia; check electrolytes, renal function, ketones if indicated, and infection.
- Restart insulin with a realistic regimen and demonstrate administration; involve a pharmacist and diabetes educator.
- Arrange a home safety and nursing evaluation, meal delivery or food resources, and transportation.
- Assess the bruise and screen for depression and cognitive impairment when medically stable.
- With permission, involve the daughter in practical planning; separate her concerns from the patient’s wishes.
If she has capacity but refuses:
- Respect her right to refuse, even if the team disagrees.
- Explain consequences clearly, offer alternatives, and document the discussion.
- Use harm reduction: prepacked insulin, reminders, community meals, and a safety check-in.
- Report suspected exploitation or self-neglect as required.
- Reassess capacity if her condition changes; capacity can fluctuate.
The reasoning: autonomy and dignity matter, but the clinician must ensure the refusal is informed and not the product of untreated depression, coercion, or cognitive impairment.