I85PREP
⌘ K
NCCT NCPCT study materials
NCCT NCPCT study resources

Refusing Breakfast Three Days After a Stroke

NCCT NCPCT · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Refusing Breakfast Three Days After a Stroke

Mr. Alvarez is a 78-year-old man on day 3 after a left-hemisphere stroke. He has right-sided weakness, a bedside swallow evaluation still pending, and an indwelling urinary catheter. He wears nasal cannula at 2 L/min and has an IV in his right forearm. At 07:30 he says he is 'not hungry,' wants to skip breakfast, and asks to be left alone in bed with both side rails down so he can rest. His daughter, who holds his durable power of attorney, is at work and cannot be reached. His last intake was 14 hours ago: about half a cup of water. He has an 08:00 order to transfer to a chair and a care plan reading 'ambulate with standby assist twice daily.'

1. What do you assess and do before you simply accept his refusal of breakfast?

Read the worked answer

A refused meal is a clinical data point, not just a preference.

  • Look for a cause the patient cannot name: new confusion from baseline, pain, nausea, constipation, a dry or painful mouth, poorly fitting dentures, or an uncomfortable position. New confusion after a stroke is a change in condition, not stubbornness.
  • Verify the diet order first. If the swallow evaluation is still pending, he may be NPO except medications. In that case you should not be feeding him at all, and the pending evaluation needs to be reported.
  • Check objective data: point-of-care glucose if ordered, last charted intake/output, temperature.
  • Intervene cheaply before escalating: oral care, sitting him upright, offering small portions or a preferred item, and re-offering in 30 minutes.
  • Autonomy: a decisionally capable adult may refuse food. You do not need the daughter or the DPOA for a routine refusal, and you should not pressure him.
  • Do not grant the rails-down request. That is a fall risk, not a rest accommodation. Lower the bed, put the call light in his strong hand, and leave the rails in the position the care plan specifies.
  • Report and document: notify the nurse of the refusal and re-offer later. Escalate urgently if he is also refusing medications or if his level of consciousness has changed.

2. At 08:00 he insists on getting into the chair. How do you decide whether he is safe to transfer, and how do you perform it?

Read the worked answer

Decide before you move him.

  • Confirm the order and weight-bearing status and whether physical therapy has cleared him for transfers.
  • Take a lying and sitting blood pressure. A symptomatic drop means he sits back down, not that he 'pushes through.'
  • Time analgesia so the transfer is not at peak pain, and check that the catheter tubing and IV line will not be pulled.

Then set up the environment:

  • Locked wheelchair placed on his strong left side, so he turns toward his strong side.
  • Gait belt on, non-skid footwear, clear path, bed at a safe height.
  • Catheter bag below bladder level and not kinked; IV pump on battery for the move.

During the transfer:

  • Stand on his weak right side and guide with the gait belt. Never pull him up by the weak right arm - the shoulder may be subluxed and the joint is unstable after a stroke.
  • Have him push off the bed with his strong arm, count to three, and pivot toward the strong side.
  • If he becomes pale or dizzy, sit him back down and get help.

3. An hour later you find the call light on the floor, the near rail down, and he says he 'didn't want to bother anyone' and tried to reach the bathroom alone. What do you do and how do you respond?

Read the worked answer

Sequence: injury check, then safety, then the reason behind the behavior.

  1. Assess for injury before anything else - pain, new weakness, any change in mental status.
  2. Restore safety without scolding: bed low, call light in his strong hand, rail per the care plan, and report to the nurse that the alarm and rail status need review.
  3. Ask why, rather than lecturing. Common answers: nobody came, the urinal was out of reach, he feared being a burden, or he had sudden urgency. Each one has a fix - scheduled toileting, a urinal within reach, a faster response plan.
  4. Stay in scope: you can implement what the care plan already allows and you can ask for a change; you do not unilaterally rewrite the fall-prevention plan or remove a bed alarm.
  5. Document objectively: time found, position of the bed and rail, his exact words, what you did, who you notified. Chart behavior and interventions, not character judgments such as 'noncompliant.'