The Changing Alibi at the Gym
A seaman reports that he was assaulted outside the base gym at 21:40. He names a petty officer second class as the assailant. Two witnesses state they saw the petty officer near the gym at 21:30, but the petty officer tells you he was at the exchange from 21:00 to 22:00 and has a receipt time-stamped 21:52. You ask him to come to the NCIS office for an interview; he agrees and arrives voluntarily. He is not under arrest. You have 90 minutes before his duty shift. During the interview, he initially says he went straight to the exchange, then says he 'might have' walked past the gym, then asks whether cameras cover the gym entrance. He has not been advised of Article 31(b) rights or Miranda.
1. What rights advisement is required before questioning, and how does the voluntary office interview affect custody analysis?
Read the worked answer
Article 31(b) applies because the petty officer is a suspect. Military rules require that a suspect be advised of the nature of the suspected offense and of the right to remain silent and to consult counsel before custodial interrogation or before requesting a statement. This applies even if the interview is voluntary and non-custodial in the Miranda sense.
Miranda custody analysis: A voluntary office interview is not automatically custody. Factors include whether a reasonable person would feel free to leave, whether the door is locked, whether the suspect was told he could leave, how many agents are present, and whether the tone is accusatory. Here, he came voluntarily and is not under arrest, but that does not remove the Article 31(b) requirement.
Practical approach: Advise him under Article 31(b) before substantive questioning about the assault. Document the exact advisement, his response, and any waiver. If he invokes silence or counsel, stop questioning. Do not use the 90-minute shift deadline as a reason to skip the advisement.
2. Outline an interview strategy that addresses the changing story without contaminating the statement or risking a false confession.
Read the worked answer
Use a structured, non-coercive approach.
- Establish a baseline with open-ended questions about his day, route, and routine. Let him give a free narrative before challenging details.
- Clarify the receipt. Ask when and where he got it, what he purchased, and whether anyone was with him. A time-stamped receipt is not proof of continuous presence.
- Explore the gym comment neutrally. Ask what he meant by 'might have' walked past the gym and whether he knows anyone who was there.
- Confront inconsistencies gradually. Later in the interview, introduce the witness accounts and the gym camera question. Ask for an explanation rather than accusing him of lying.
- Avoid false-evidence ploys and threats. Do not tell him cameras caught him if they did not, and do not promise leniency. These tactics increase false-confession risk and undermine reliability.
- Document verbatim the changing statements, the exact questions, breaks, and his demeanor.
The goal is a reliable, voluntary account that can be tested against independent evidence, not a confession produced by pressure.
3. What follow-up investigative steps would you take regarding the receipt and gym cameras, and how would you document the interview?
Read the worked answer
Corroborate the alibi independently.
- Obtain the receipt through consent or legal process and verify the transaction time with the exchange's point-of-sale records and any clerk who remembers him.
- Pull gym entrance video for 21:15–21:50 and preserve it with a hash value before it overwrites. Determine camera coverage and whether the petty officer appears.
- Interview the two witnesses separately and ask how certain they are, how long they observed him, and what lighting conditions were.
- Check access-control records, if any, for the gym and exchange.
Documentation: Record the interview start and stop times, the Article 31(b) advisement and waiver, the exact sequence of his statements, any breaks, and who else was present. Note the 90-minute constraint but do not let it truncate required advisement. Preserve rough notes and any recording according to policy. The changing story should be quoted, not summarized as 'he lied.'