The Terminated Appointment and the Leftover POA
Dana holds a North Dakota bail bond agent license and was appointed by Ridgeline Surety until February 28. On March 1 she received Ridgeline's written termination notice and was told to return her power of attorney and unused forms. She did not. Her appointment with Prairie State Surety is pending and will not be effective until April 15. On March 10, Dana used Ridgeline's preprinted $30,000 appearance bond form and a Ridgeline POA to post bail for Marcus, who was charged with felony theft. She signed as 'authorized agent,' collected a $3,000 premium, and filed the bond with the clerk. Marcus appeared at every hearing and the case was later dismissed. On March 20 Ridgeline's home office discovered the bond and sent the court a letter disclaiming coverage because Dana's appointment had ended. Dana says her license is still active, so she believes the bond is valid. The clerk calls you for guidance.
1. Did Dana have authority to execute the March 10 bond? Explain the roles of license, appointment, and power of attorney.
Read the worked answer
No. A North Dakota bail bond agent license only makes Dana eligible to hold an appointment; it does not itself authorize her to execute surety bonds. Authority comes from a current appointment by an authorized surety and a valid, unexpired power of attorney. Ridgeline terminated the appointment before March 10 and demanded return of the POA and forms. The pending Prairie State appointment was not effective until April 15 and could not retroactively validate a March 10 bond. Using Ridgeline's old forms and POA after termination is unauthorized execution, not a mere paperwork error. The bond may be enforceable against Dana personally or not at all against Ridgeline, depending on the court's findings and any ratification, but Ridgeline is entitled to disclaim. Dana's active license does not cure the gap.
2. What regulatory and contractual consequences follow for Dana, Ridgeline, and Marcus? What should the court do?
Read the worked answer
Ridgeline should promptly notify the court and surety, preserve the POA and bond file, and cooperate. Dana faces Insurance Department discipline for executing without appointment or authority and for failing to return the POA and forms; possible license suspension or revocation, fines, and personal liability to the court or indemnitor. Marcus's liberty should not rest on an unauthorized bond: the court should order a replacement bond by an authorized agent or return him to custody if no valid bond exists. If the court already accepted the bond and Marcus appeared, the court may allow a curative replacement and set aside any forfeiture, but that does not make Ridgeline liable. Dana should not keep a premium for unauthorized surety business; she should refund or account for it.
3. What should Dana have done on March 1 and on March 10?
Read the worked answer
On March 1 Dana should have stopped writing Ridgeline business immediately, returned the POA and unused forms, and documented the termination. She should have waited for Prairie State's appointment and POA before executing any bond. On March 10 she should have declined the bond, told Marcus and the court she was not appointed, and helped arrange another licensed and appointed agent or a cash bond. She should never alter or reuse an old POA. She should also notify her errors-and-omissions insurer and the Department if a bond was filed without authority.