ND Chiropractic Jurisprudence study materials
ND Chiropractic Jurisprudence study resources

The Late Renewal and the Missing Ethics Hours

ND Chiropractic Jurisprudence · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Late Renewal and the Missing Ethics Hours

Dr. B's North Dakota chiropractic license expires on June 30. In May, Dr. B moves to a new office and does not notify the Board of the address change. The renewal notice goes to the old address. Dr. B continues treating patients from July 1 through July 18-22 patient visits-believing the license is still active because no one from the Board called. On July 20, Dr. B submits a late renewal with the fee and 20 continuing education hours. The CE log includes a 4-hour 'social media marketing' course and a 2-hour ethics course from an online vendor that is not on the Board's approved-provider list. The Board's CE rule requires 20 hours per licensing year, including 2 hours of ethics from an approved provider. An audit flags the late renewal.

1. Was Dr. B licensed to practice between July 1 and July 18? Explain, including the effect of the missing renewal notice and the late filing.

Read the worked answer

No. A license expires by operation of law on the stated expiration date. The Board is not required to prove that the licensee received a renewal notice, and the notice going to the old address does not extend the license. Practicing after expiration is unlicensed practice, and each of the 22 patient encounters is a separate violation. The late filing and fee do not retroactively validate the July 1–18 treatment.

The missing notice may be mitigation, not a defense. Dr. B had an independent duty to keep the Board informed of the current address and to know the renewal date. The Board may consider the absence of patient harm, the short duration, and self-correction, but it can still impose discipline for unlicensed practice and for failing to update the address.

2. Evaluate Dr. B's CE compliance. Which hours count, and what must Dr. B do before the Board will renew?

Read the worked answer

The Board requires 20 hours, including 2 ethics hours from an approved provider. The 4-hour social media marketing course may not count unless the Board's rule expressly permits practice-management or marketing content; that must be verified against the current rule. The 2-hour ethics course is deficient because the vendor is not approved, even if the content is relevant. Dr. B therefore has not satisfied the ethics requirement and may also be short of acceptable total hours.

Before renewal, Dr. B should replace the unapproved ethics hours with a Board-approved ethics course and, if the marketing course is disallowed, complete additional approved hours. Dr. B should submit documentation and ask the Board whether late CE will be accepted with a penalty or whether additional hours are required. The Board, not the licensee, decides provider approval.

3. What disciplinary and remedial outcomes are likely, and what should Dr. B do now?

Read the worked answer

Dr. B should stop practicing until the license is active, update the address, self-report the lapse, and cooperate with the audit. Because the unlicensed period was short, no harm is reported, and Dr. B is correcting the CE deficiency, the Board may resolve the matter with a reprimand, fine, probation, additional CE, and a records audit. A longer suspension is less likely but remains possible because unlicensed practice is serious.

Dr. B should not backdate CE or submit misleading logs. The strongest mitigation is prompt correction, full disclosure, and evidence of a compliance system: calendar reminders, address-change procedures, and pre-renewal CE verification. The Board's order should be reviewed for reporting obligations to insurers and employers.