The Appraisal Gap and the Borrower Who Is Nine Points Over
Priya has a signed purchase agreement for a $312,000 house, closing in 30 days. She applied for a conventional 90% loan, $280,800, at 6.5% for 30 years. The appraisal came in at $298,000. The lender will lend 90% of the lesser of price or appraised value. The seller agreed to pay 3% of the price toward Priya's closing costs ($9,360). Priya's gross monthly income is $7,150. Her obligations: car payment $415, student loan $185, minimum credit card $65. Estimated on the new loan: property taxes $310/month, homeowner's insurance $115/month, PMI $112/month, no HOA. Priya has $46,000 in savings and a friend told her, "Appraisals are negotiable - just order second ones until it comes in at the price."
1. Compute the loan amount, the cash gap, and whether Priya can close as written.
Read the worked answer
The loan is based on the lesser of price or appraised value: 90% × $298,000 = $268,200. Priya applied for $280,800, so there is a $12,600 gap.
Her cash need is not just the gap. Down payment is 10% of the appraised value = $29,800. Add the gap of $12,600: $42,400 in equity cash, before closing costs.
The $9,360 seller concession may be applied to closing costs and prepaids, but not to the down payment or the gap. So her cash requirement is roughly $42,400 plus closing costs and prepaids, reduced by up to $9,360 of allowable concession. On $46,000 of savings that is extremely thin - she would close with almost nothing left, which most lenders and agents would flag as a risk given the 30-day window and the possibility of a low water heater or roof finding.
The concession itself is within conventional limits: 3% is allowed where the loan-to-value is 90% or less (up to 6% is permitted in that band). The problem is the value, not the credit.
2. Run the qualifying ratios and tell Priya what they mean.
Read the worked answer
Principal and interest on $268,200 at 6.5% for 30 years is about $1,695. Add taxes $310, insurance $115, and PMI $112: PITI ≈ $2,232.
Front-end (housing only): 2,232 ÷ 7,150 = 31.2%. Other debt: 415 + 185 + 65 = $665. Total obligations $2,897. Back-end: 2,897 ÷ 7,150 = 40.5%.
Manual conventional underwriting guidelines are commonly 28/36, so she is over on both counts: 31.2 versus 28, and 40.5 versus 36. That does not automatically kill the file - an automated underwriting recommendation can approve higher ratios, often into the mid-40s, depending on reserves and credit. But nobody can promise that in advance.
Options to model rather than assert: paying off the car drops the back-end to about 34.7% (2,482 ÷ 7,150), but only if the funds are verified and seasoned and the payment is truly retired; increasing the down payment reduces the loan and PMI; a lower purchase price reduces both. Give Priya the numbers and let the loan officer run the file.
3. How should the agent respond to the "order appraisals until it hits the price" advice and to the concession?
Read the worked answer
The agent should say plainly: no. Repeatedly ordering appraisals to reach a predetermined number is appraisal pressure and, if it involves withholding information or shopping lenders for a favored appraiser, it shades into mortgage fraud. A licensee may provide a factual rebuttal package - the pending sale, better comps, corrections to square footage - and the lender decides whether to reconsider. That is advocacy; serial reappraisal is manipulation.
Equally off-limits: suggesting the seller raise the price so the concession covers the gap. The loan is based on the appraised value, so a higher price does not create a higher loan, and restructuring the concession as a down-payment credit misrepresents the source of funds on a federally related mortgage.
Disclose the gap to Priya in writing, present the real options - renegotiate to $298,000 (down payment $29,800, closing costs partly covered by the concession), bring more cash, pay off the car, or walk - and note the appraisal contingency deadline. Do not let a 30-day clock pressure her into a structure that fails underwriting on day 25.