School Evaluation Delay and Records Dispute
Dr. Nguyen is a school psychologist in a Nebraska public school district. A parent requests a full special-education evaluation for her 9-year-old son, Marcus, who has a diagnosis of ADHD from a pediatrician and is reading two grade levels below peers. Marcus has received six weeks of Tier 2 reading intervention, and the school's problem-solving team wants to continue intervention for another 20 weeks before deciding whether to evaluate. The parent also asks to inspect Marcus's cumulative file and wants the school to destroy an old disciplinary record from second grade that she says is wrong. The school's special-education director says, 'We don't have to evaluate while RTI is working; and we can destroy records whenever they are no longer needed.' The parent has not revoked consent for anything. Nebraska Rule 51 and federal IDEA/FERPA apply. Dr. Nguyen must respond to the parent and the director.
1. Must the district evaluate Marcus now? Explain using IDEA, Nebraska Rule 51, and the RTI issue.
Read the worked answer
The district likely must evaluate. IDEA's child-find duty requires evaluation when the district has reason to suspect a disability and the child needs special education; a parent request plus a pediatric ADHD diagnosis and a two-grade-level reading deficit create that suspicion. RTI is a general-education support and cannot be used to delay or deny an initial evaluation. Nebraska Rule 51 implements IDEA and requires parental consent, a comprehensive evaluation, and the state's timeline-generally 60 days from consent unless extended by agreement. The team may continue Tier 2 or Tier 3 intervention during the evaluation, but it cannot say 'RTI is working' to postpone. If the district refuses, it must give prior written notice and procedural safeguards. Dr. Nguyen should explain this to the director and help obtain consent.
2. How should Dr. Nguyen respond to the parent's records requests, including the request to destroy the disciplinary record?
Read the worked answer
FERPA gives the parent the right to inspect and review Marcus's education records within 45 days of the request. The cumulative file and the disciplinary record are likely education records. The parent may request amendment if she believes the record is inaccurate or misleading; if the school refuses, it must inform her of the right to a hearing. The school should not destroy the disciplinary record while a request or dispute is pending, and it must follow its records-retention schedule and notice requirements before any destruction. It cannot destroy the record simply because the parent says it is wrong or because staff want to clean the file. Dr. Nguyen should route the request to the records custodian, document the request date, and avoid informal alteration or removal.
3. If the parent disagrees with the district's evaluation, what options and procedural safeguards apply?
Read the worked answer
If the parent disagrees with the district's evaluation, she can request an independent educational evaluation at public expense. The district must either fund the IEE or file for a due-process hearing to show its evaluation was appropriate. The parent also has mediation and due-process rights, and the child's current placement generally remains during the dispute under stay-put. The district must provide procedural safeguards and cannot retaliate. Dr. Nguyen should give the parent the safeguards notice, explain the IEE process, and avoid promising a particular eligibility outcome. If the evaluation is incomplete, the team should address gaps before hearing.