Unlicensed Claim Consultant in Kearney
Dana is a retired roofing contractor in Kearney, Nebraska. She advertises insurance claim consulting on social media and charges homeowners 12% of any increase she obtains over the insurer's initial offer. For a homeowner with a $38,000 initial hail estimate, Dana reviews the policy, measures the roof, prepares a scope, attends the insurer's inspection, and emails the carrier demanding $57,000. She never signs a public adjuster contract and tells the homeowner, I'm just a consultant, so no license is needed. She also offers a neighbor a $500 flat fee to review and negotiate a small fire claim. A licensed public adjuster is asked to take over the file after the homeowner becomes uneasy. The homeowner paid Dana $2,280 after the carrier added $19,000.
1. Is Dana likely required to hold a Nebraska public adjuster license? Analyze the line between consulting and public adjusting.
Read the worked answer
Likely yes. Nebraska regulates public adjusting by function, not by title. A public adjuster is generally a person who, for compensation, acts on behalf of an insured to negotiate, settle, or advise on a first-party property claim. Dana does all three: she reviews coverage, measures the roof, prepares a scope, attends the insurer inspection, and demands $57,000 from the carrier. Her 12% contingency and the $500 flat fee are both compensation. Calling herself a consultant does not avoid licensure, and a flat fee does not create a true professional-fee exception. A licensed adjuster taking over should not adopt her unauthorized work as a workaround, should obtain the insured's written authorization, and should independently document the file. The insured may owe no enforceable fee to an unlicensed person, and Dana may face cease-and-desist, fines, and restitution.
2. What consequences and ethical issues arise for Dana and for a licensed public adjuster who might associate with her?
Read the worked answer
Dana's exposure includes unlicensed activity, possible contract unenforceability, fee disgorgement, administrative fines, and a cease-and-desist order. A licensed public adjuster who pays Dana a referral fee, splits the fee, or lets her continue negotiating under the licensed adjuster's authority risks aiding unlicensed activity and prohibited fee-sharing. The licensed adjuster should not validate the prior fee arrangement, should put the new contract in writing with the insured, and should document all work independently. If Dana's prior conduct involved misrepresentation to the carrier, the licensed adjuster must correct the record rather than carry the error forward. Ethical practice also requires explaining to the insured that the prior consultant may not be lawfully entitled to compensation and that the insured should seek independent advice about any refund demand.