Fan Sound Power in a Non-Ideal Test Room
You must determine the octave-band sound power level of a 1.5 m diameter axial fan for a submittal. The only available room is a hard-surfaced mechanical room 12 m by 9 m by 4.5 m (volume 486 m³). Measured reverberation times are 1.2 s at 125 Hz, 1.8 s at 500 Hz, and 0.9 s at 4 kHz. You plan a hemispherical measurement surface of 2 m radius. At 500 Hz the fan-on sound pressure level is 78 dB and the fan-off background is 62 dB. The room has no qualified reference sound source, but you have a Type 1 sound level meter and a sound intensity probe. The client wants a grade 2 result and asks whether the room can be used with a simple environmental correction or whether intensity measurements are necessary. The fan has a broadband spectrum with no strong tones.
1. Calculate the equivalent absorption area and the environmental correction K2 at 500 Hz for the 2 m hemisphere. Is the room suitable for an ISO 3744 grade 2 determination?
Read the worked answer
V = 486 m³, T = 1.8 s, so A = 0.16 V/T = 0.16 × 486 / 1.8 = 43.2 m². For a hemisphere of radius 2 m, S = 2πr² = 2π(2)² = 25.1 m². K2 = 10 log10(1 + 4S/A) = 10 log10(1 + 100.5/43.2) = 10 log10(3.33) = 5.2 dB. At 125 Hz and 4 kHz the values are also above 3 dB. A grade 2 determination normally expects K2 no greater than about 2 dB; 5.2 dB is too large, so the room is not suitable for an ISO 3744 grade 2 result using a simple correction. Adding absorption or using a larger room would be needed if the pressure method were retained.
2. Why is sound intensity attractive here, and what checks must the intensity data pass before you report a sound power level?
Read the worked answer
Sound intensity is preferable because it measures the net acoustic power passing through a surface and is much less affected by room reverberation and steady background. Before accepting the data, check that the background intensity is at least 10 dB below the source in each band; otherwise the result is invalid. Check the pressure-intensity indicator (F2 or F3 as required by the chosen ISO 9614 grade), repeatability of the scan, scan speed and path, probe calibration and phase mismatch, negative intensity values, air currents, and source steadiness. Use a windscreen and average multiple scans. If the intensity data pass these checks, a grade 2 or better sound power level can be reported even though the room is reverberant.
3. The client suggests subtracting 62 dB from 78 dB and reporting 78 dB. Evaluate that proposal.
Read the worked answer
Subtracting 62 dB from 78 dB is not correct. The exact background correction is 10 log10(10^7.8 - 10^6.2) = 77.9 dB, so the correction is only about 0.1 dB; a simple subtraction would give 16 dB and is wrong. More importantly, the background is not the main problem: the room correction K2 is about 5.2 dB, which is larger than the background correction and cannot be ignored. Reporting 78 dB would overstate or understate the sound power depending on how K2 is applied. The defensible path is intensity measurement, or a qualified room with K2 below 2 dB.