NES study materials
NES study resources

Extended Time in a 47-Minute Period

NES · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Extended Time in a 47-Minute Period

Mr. Okafor teaches seventh-grade science in 47-minute periods; his class meets second period. The unit test is built for about 40 minutes of working time. Three students have IEPs: one is entitled to 1.5× time on all assessments, one to preferential seating and breaks as needed, and one to read-aloud of directions only. A fourth student has a 504 plan for anxiety and may leave the room to a designated spot without asking. The resource room, the school's usual extended-time setting, is staffed only during periods 2, 4, and 6, and period 2 is when Mr. Okafor's class meets, so sending students there would remove them from the test. A colleague suggests simply giving the whole class 1.5× time and finishing the next day. Grades are due Friday.

1. Do the time arithmetic, identify what is actually owed, and propose a compliant plan for test day.

Read the worked answer

Arithmetic: 40 minutes of designed working time × 1.5 = 60 minutes. The period is 47 minutes. The shortfall is at least 13 minutes before transitions, materials distribution, and directions, so realistically 15–20 minutes.

What is owed: The 1.5× entitlement is 60 minutes of working time, not "as much as fits in the period." Mr. Okafor cannot waive it, shorten it, or substitute a different support because the schedule is awkward.

A workable plan:

  1. Call the case manager today. The decision to split a test across settings or days belongs to the IEP team, not to the teacher alone. Ask whether a two-session administration (each session at 1.5×) is already authorized or can be authorized in writing.
  2. Use period 4 in the resource room for continuation if the team prefers a single test broken only by the bell. The student starts in class at the bell, works the full 47 minutes, moves with a pre-arranged pass, and finishes during period 4 with a proctor.
  3. Protect test security. The student must not carry the test through the hallway; a sealed envelope or a proctor-delivered second portion prevents item exposure to students who have not tested.
  4. Build the other two accommodations into the same plan: a printed read-aloud script for the directions-only student, and a scheduled whole-class stretch break so the breaks-as-needed student does not have to request one publicly.
  5. Document what was provided and when, because the Friday grade deadline does not create permission to under-serve.

2. Evaluate the colleague's suggestion to give the entire class 1.5× time and finish the next day.

Read the worked answer

It is a defensible class-wide practice but not a solution, and not a substitute for the entitlement.

Where it is sound:

  • On a unit test, speed is not part of the construct being measured, so extra time for everyone is a legitimate universal-design move and removes the stigma of a visible accommodation.

Where it fails:

  • It does not deliver what is owed. Forty-seven minutes for everyone is not 60 minutes for the entitled student. The accommodation remains unmet.
  • It creates a two-day window across all sections, which raises item-exposure risk between periods and stretches the unit past the grading deadline.
  • It confuses the record. If the accommodation is silently absorbed into class practice, no one can later evaluate whether the student's IEP is working.
  • It is not the teacher's call to make unilaterally as a replacement for an IEP service; it can only be added with the team's agreement.

Verdict: adopt class-wide extra time only as an added UDL measure if the team agrees, and still arrange the separate 60-minute setting for the entitled student.

3. How should Mr. Okafor manage confidentiality and dignity on test day, including the student who does not want to be seen leaving?

Read the worked answer

Rule: the accommodation is visible only to the people who need to see it.

  • Never name students or read accommodation lists aloud. Keep the accommodation sheet in a locked drawer or a password-protected file, not on the desk.
  • Use signals instead of requests. Agree in advance on a nonverbal signal (a pass on the desk, a hand sign, a sticky note) so the anxiety-plan student can exit and the breaks student can step out without announcing anything.
  • Normalize exits and breaks. Schedule a whole-class stretch break and post a general "water/pass" routine so leaving is unremarkable. Seat students who may exit near the door.
  • Handle the reluctant student directly but privately. Say something like: "The team wrote this plan because it gives you a fair shot, and no one in the room will know why you go. You'll leave during the announcements and come back the same way." Then arrange the least-visible route and a proctor who does not comment on the reason.
  • Do not require an explanation on return, and do not ask the student in front of peers where they went.
  • Never discuss the 504 or IEP with peers, in class, or with other parents - including when explaining why one student has more time.