The Client Who Wants Stricter Rules, a Test Booster, and a Note to His Doctor
Aaron, 35, has been your client for six sessions. In eight weeks he has lost 9 kg preparing for a powerlifting meet, eating about 1,500 kcal on weekdays and 4,000-5,000 kcal on Saturdays and Sundays. He texts you at midnight after these weekends saying he has "ruined everything" and asks you to set stricter rules, weigh him daily, and take his bathroom scale home so he "can't cheat." He also asks you to recommend the "test booster" a training partner uses and to email his endocrinologist saying his thyroid dose is "fine" so he can skip his next appointment. He mentions he has stopped eating lunch with coworkers because he cannot control himself around the break-room food, and he has missed two sessions because he was "too ashamed."
1. What behavioral pattern is operating, and why would giving him stricter rules likely backfire? What do you actually say in the next session?
Read the worked answer
The pattern is restraint followed by disinhibition, with shame as the glue: weekday rules create deprivation, the weekend feels like a loss of control, and the midnight texts are the aftermath. Asking for stricter rules is predictable - restriction is the only tool he currently has - but tightening rules raises the deprivation that triggers the next episode. It is a cycle, not a willpower failure.
In the session, I would not lead with the weekend numbers. I would ask what he wants his training to feel like, then what happens in the 24 hours before Saturday: hunger, stress, social context, the break room. Then I would reframe the weekends as information rather than evidence of failure, and negotiate one modest change - a protein- and fibre-containing Saturday lunch, or a planned dessert - instead of a new rulebook.
I would decline daily weighing and offer a weekly weigh-in under standard conditions. The social withdrawal and missed sessions matter as much as the intake: I would ask directly about purging, laxatives and compensatory exercise, because 1,500 kcal weekdays plus weekend bingeing warrants screening for binge-eating disorder.
2. Address the three requests - the scale, the supplement, and the email to the endocrinologist - with the scope-of-practice reasoning behind each.
Read the worked answer
The scale: taking it away or mandating daily weigh-ins removes his agency and reinforces the belief that he cannot be trusted. Instead, offer a weekly same-conditions weigh-in he performs and reports, or drop weighing for a month and track performance, hunger and sleep. External control is not coaching.
The supplement: "test boosters" are largely unproven, sometimes contaminated, and a few ingredients have caused liver injury. I would say I do not recommend it, explain the anti-doping and health risk for a drug-tested lifter, and route the underlying question - is he eating and sleeping enough to support training - back into the plan. No specific product endorsement, no dose.
The endocrinologist email: I cannot contact his physician to declare a thyroid dose "fine," and I cannot advise on thyroid medication at all - that is medical practice. What I can do is help him write a short question list and encourage him to keep the appointment. If he wants coordination with his care team, that runs through a signed release, and my message would be limited to nutrition and training facts.
In each case the same principle applies: decline the specific request, name the boundary, and offer the legitimate alternative.
3. What would trigger a referral, and how do you document this and future sessions?
Read the worked answer
Referral triggers: any indication of binge-eating disorder, purging, laxative or diuretic use, or compensatory exercise; worsening restriction or rapid continued loss with fear of regain; symptoms of depression or anxiety; social withdrawal that is escalating; or a medical condition being managed without follow-up. Refer to a physician, an eating-disorder-competent registered dietitian, and a mental-health professional where available. Provide the referral rather than making the diagnosis, and frame it as adding expertise, not as ending the relationship.
Documentation: record what he asked for, what you provided, what you declined and why, the referrals offered, and whether he accepted. Keep notes factual and behaviour-focused rather than interpretive. Use a signed informed-consent and release form before any third-party communication.
Ongoing boundary-setting: restate scope in the first session and repeat it when tested - you are not a prescriber, not a psychotherapist, and not a substitute for his endocrinologist. Repeat requests to make medical decisions are the signal to hold the line firmly and involve his care team. If he ever describes a medical emergency, direct him to urgent care and document it the same day.