Public Bucket and the 30-Day AI Feature
A fintech runs 140 AWS accounts under AWS Organizations and employs 2,000 developers. A developer deploys a public S3 bucket containing 1.2 million customer statements; GuardDuty alerts 40 minutes later, and an external researcher also emails the security team. The company has SCPs but no central CloudTrail log archive, and its infrastructure-as-code templates still allow public ACLs. Two partner file exchanges rely on public buckets and cannot change before quarter end. The CISO wants to block all public buckets in 48 hours. Separately, a new AI assistant feature would send customer chat transcripts to a third-party LLM for summarization; product wants to launch in 30 days. The security team has two cloud engineers and no dedicated detection engineering. The board asks for a cloud security roadmap after a competitor's breach.
1. What immediate actions would you take for the public bucket, and what would you not do?
Read the worked answer
Immediate actions: identify the bucket and its contents, apply S3 Block Public Access at the bucket and account level, preserve access logs and CloudTrail evidence, determine the exposure window, and check whether object-level access logging exists. Rotate any credentials or tokens contained in exposed objects, and engage legal and privacy to assess notification. Do not delete the bucket or objects before forensics; do not silently make it private and close the ticket; do not assume no one accessed it because GuardDuty fired quickly. The 48-hour blanket block is the right direction but would break the two partner exchanges, so inventory exceptions first, then apply organization-level block public access with a time-bound, IP-restricted exception for those partners. Check other buckets and the IaC templates, and enable a central CloudTrail trail. Communicate to customers only after facts are established. Document the evidence chain.
2. Design guardrails that preserve developer autonomy. What preventive versus detective controls would you use?
Read the worked answer
Preventive controls should make the secure path the easy path, not push developers into shadow IT. Use SCPs to deny public S3 ACLs and policies, deny long-lived IAM user keys, require encryption, and restrict regions. Apply organization-level Block Public Access but create a tagged exception OU or bucket policy for the two partner exchanges, with expiry and IP restrictions. Provide approved IaC modules and policy-as-code checks in CI so developers get fast feedback in pull requests. Detective controls include an organization CloudTrail trail to a central log archive, AWS Config rules for public buckets, Security Hub findings, and automated remediation for non-exception buckets. With two cloud engineers, automate remediation and reporting rather than manually reviewing every bucket. Measure accounts with central logging, public buckets outside exceptions, and mean time to remediate. Review exceptions quarterly.
3. Should the AI assistant launch in 30 days? What conditions and data protections would you require?
Read the worked answer
Do not launch as described. Sending customer chat transcripts to a third-party LLM creates confidentiality, data-processing, and residency issues. Conditions: classify and minimize data; redact PII and account numbers before sending; require contractual no-training and no-retention terms; complete a DPA and subprocessor review; encrypt in transit; enforce access controls and prompt logging; assess the vendor; and test for prompt injection and hallucination. If the vendor cannot guarantee no training and deletion, use a private endpoint or self-hosted model. Launch a limited pilot with synthetic or de-identified data, not production transcripts, and define success and kill criteria. Thirty days may be enough for a pilot, not general availability. Security should provide a checklist and a risk-acceptance path, not just say no. Reassess after 60 days, and confirm regulatory obligations such as GLBA and state privacy law before any production use.