The Inflated Contents Inventory and the Request to Pad the Claim
After a flood, an insured submits a contents inventory claiming $48,000. It includes a 65-inch television, a diamond ring valued at $6,000, $1,500 in cash, a riding lawnmower, and 12 pairs of designer shoes. The adjuster's site photos show the television was on a second-floor wall bracket and the water line was only 2 feet on the first floor. The insured provides two receipts for the same television, one altered to show a higher price. The insured also asks the adjuster to 'add $5,000 for my deductible' and says, 'Everyone does it.' The adjuster has not yet signed the proof of loss. The policy has $100,000 contents coverage and a $1,000 deductible. The claim is otherwise covered, but the adjuster suspects material misrepresentation. The insured becomes hostile when asked for purchase records.
1. Identify the fraud red flags and explain why each matters.
Read the worked answer
Several red flags appear. The television is claimed as flood-damaged, but the photos place it on a second-floor bracket above the 2-foot water line; that is a physical inconsistency. The two receipts for the same television, one altered to a higher price, suggest a material misrepresentation and possible document alteration. The request to 'add $5,000 for my deductible' is an explicit invitation to inflate the claim. The statement 'Everyone does it' shows intent to justify the inflation. The diamond ring and cash raise special-limit or exclusion issues: cash is excluded, and jewelry is subject to a special limit. The riding lawnmower and designer shoes should be verified for ownership, location, and damage. The insured's hostility when asked for purchase records is a secondary indicator. Each red flag matters because the SFIP denies coverage for intentional concealment or misrepresentation of a material fact.
2. What should the adjuster do next, and what should the adjuster not do?
Read the worked answer
The adjuster should stop, document, and refer. Document the inventory, the photos, the water line, the receipts, and the insured's statements verbatim. Preserve the altered receipts and do not alter anything. Do not accuse the insured or argue; explain that the claim is being reviewed. Do not sign a proof of loss that includes items the adjuster knows are false or unsupported. Do not add an amount for the deductible or negotiate a 'rounded' figure. Report the suspected fraud through the insurer's special investigation unit or the NFIP fraud referral process. Cooperate with the investigation and keep the file confidential. The adjuster may pay the undisputed covered portion if the insurer authorizes it, but should not pay the disputed items. The adjuster should not threaten criminal prosecution; that is not the adjuster's role.
3. What are the potential consequences for the insured under the SFIP and federal law?
Read the worked answer
Under the SFIP, intentional concealment or misrepresentation of a material fact relating to the insurance can void coverage for the entire claim, not just the false items. The insurer may deny the claim and may seek repayment of any amounts already paid. Under federal law, knowingly making a false statement or submitting a false claim can violate 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and other fraud statutes, exposing the insured to criminal fines, restitution, and imprisonment. Civil penalties may also apply. The adjuster's role is not to prosecute but to report suspected fraud accurately and to avoid participating in it. The file should show what was verified, what was disputed, and what was referred. If the insured withdraws the false items, the insurer may still evaluate the remaining claim, but the misrepresentation history must be documented.