Overcrowded Second-Floor Banquet Hall with a Chained Exit
On a Saturday night, you respond to a complaint at a second-floor banquet hall licensed for 150 people. The room is hosting an event with about 180 attendees. You find the rear exit door secured with a chain and padlock, a required 36-inch aisle narrowed to about 22 inches by tables and chairs, and one exit sign above the front stair with a burned-out bulb. The posted occupant load is 120. The building is 60 years old and has a single interior stair serving the second floor. The owner says the chain is to prevent theft, the aisle is temporary, and the stair is 'grandfathered' because the building predates the current code. The event has a DJ, a cash bar, and no posted egress diagram. Staff say they have never had a fire drill.
1. What is your immediate action, and should the event be allowed to continue?
Read the worked answer
The chained rear exit is an immediate life-safety hazard. I would order the chain removed immediately and keep the exit unlocked and unobstructed. The narrowed aisle must be restored to at least the required clear width, and the burned-out exit sign must be repaired or replaced before the event continues. I would also verify the occupant load: 180 people in a space posted for 120 and licensed for 150 is overcrowded, which affects exit capacity and crowd management. If the single stair is the only exit and the applicable code requires two means of egress for that occupant load, the event cannot continue as configured. My immediate decision would be to stop admission, correct the exit and aisle, and either reduce the crowd to the approved load or close the event until the egress deficiencies are corrected. I would not accept 'temporary' tables blocking egress.
2. Identify the violations and explain how you determine whether the single stair is acceptable.
Read the worked answer
Clear violations include the exit door locked or chained, the required aisle obstructed, the exit sign not illuminated, and occupancy exceeding the posted load. The single stair requires analysis, not a blanket 'grandfather' answer. I would check the occupancy classification, occupant load, construction type, sprinkler protection, and the code edition applicable to existing buildings. A single exit may be permitted in limited cases, but not simply because the building is old. If the stair is the only means of egress and serves an occupant load above the allowed limit, or if it lacks proper enclosure, width, or signage, it is a violation. I would calculate egress capacity and travel distance, verify the stair enclosure, and document the basis. The owner's claim of grandfathering does not override immediate hazards like a chained exit.
3. What documentation and follow-up would you require?
Read the worked answer
I would document with photos, measurements, the posted occupant load, the actual attendance, and witness statements. The notice should list each violation, the code basis, the corrective action, and a deadline. Immediate corrections-chain removal, aisle clearing, exit sign-should be verified before I leave. The overcrowding and single-stair issue may require a re-inspection and possibly a plan review or occupancy load reduction. I would also check whether the event permit or business license should be conditioned on egress compliance. Follow-up includes a re-inspection during a similar event, confirmation that staff have an egress plan, and referral to the fire investigation or legal division if the owner repeats the violation. I would keep a copy of the notice and the reinspection results in the property file.