The Self-Employed Couple With No Safety Net
Tom and Aisha are both 38 and self-employed (Tom a builder, Aisha a graphic designer). Combined net profit is £74,000, but income is lumpy: last year they earned £52,000 in the final quarter. They have £3,200 in a current account, £9,000 in a stocks and shares ISA, a £210,000 mortgage at 4.9%, and two children aged 4 and 7. Tom has no income protection; Aisha has a 6-month emergency fund in her own name only. They want to 'invest more' and have been advised to put £500 a month into a global equity fund. Tom's van (essential for work) is uninsured for business use, and they have no will.
1. Critique the £500-a-month investment recommendation against the couple's cash-flow and risk position, and propose a prioritised alternative.
Read the worked answer
Critique
- The recommendation is premature. Before investing, the couple need liquidity and protection, not growth.
- Their emergency reserve is inadequate: £3,200 plus Aisha's fund covers only a fraction of the ~£6,200 monthly household outflow, and Tom's income is the more volatile. Self-employed households should hold 3–6 months of essential outgoings (roughly £18,000–£37,000), held in accessible accounts.
- Lumpy income means they need a buffer to smooth tax and NI payments (self-assessment payments on account) as well as living costs.
- The van is uninsured for business use - a single incident could destroy Tom's income and expose personal assets. This is an urgent gap.
- No will with two young children is a serious estate-planning omission.
Prioritised plan
- Fix van insurance for business use immediately (legal and income-protection necessity).
- Build a cash buffer to 3–6 months of essential spend, using a separate 'tax pot' and 'emergency pot'.
- Arrange income protection for Tom (and Aisha) and consider term life cover to protect the mortgage and children.
- Write wills and appoint guardians.
- Only then invest surplus - and start smaller (e.g. £150–£250/month) while the buffer is built.
Reasoning principle: protection and liquidity come before growth; the cost of an uninsured event or forced sale of investments dwarfs the expected return on £500/month.
2. Explain how the couple's irregular income should shape their budgeting method, and how they should treat the stocks and shares ISA.
Read the worked answer
Budgeting for irregular income
- Use a baseline (floor) budget based on the lowest reliable monthly income, funding essentials from that.
- Treat surpluses (like the £52,000 final-quarter earnings) as windfalls to allocate deliberately: top up the emergency fund, set aside tax, then invest.
- Separate accounts: income account → tax account → emergency account → spending account.
- Forecast self-assessment liabilities and make monthly provisions rather than facing a January lump sum.
- Review quarterly, since annual profit, not monthly cash, drives tax.
The ISA
- The £9,000 stocks and shares ISA is not an emergency fund - it can fall in value and may need selling at a loss just when cash is needed. It should be treated as long-term growth capital.
- Keep it invested, but do not count it toward the 3–6 month cash reserve.
- If they need liquidity, they could consider moving part to a cash ISA, but the priority is building separate accessible cash.
Judgement point: the adviser's error was treating investable surplus as available before the household had a resilience layer.