CPD Evidence at Practising-Licence Renewal
Engr. Musa, a registered agricultural engineer with 12 years' post-registration experience, applies to renew his practising licence for the current year. COREN's CPD guideline requires a minimum number of points per renewal cycle, with limits on self-study and on activities not accredited by COREN. Musa's log claims 22 points: 8 from a two-day 'precision farming' webinar run by an equipment vendor and not accredited; 6 from a COREN-accredited annual conference; 4 from mentoring two graduate engineers, supported only by a handwritten note; and 4 from reading technical journals. He believes the total is sufficient. His employer, anxious to keep him on a World Bank supervision contract, offers a letter attesting that the webinar was 'professionally relevant' and asking COREN to treat it as accredited. Musa asks you, as the branch CPD officer, to endorse the log.
1. Evaluate each CPD claim and decide whether the log can be endorsed.
Read the worked answer
Test. CPD points must be relevant to the engineer's field, verifiable, and within the guideline's rules on accreditation and caps. A claim that fails any of these tests cannot count in full.
Vendor webinar (8 points claimed). It is relevant in subject matter but was not accredited. Employer relevance does not equal accreditation. Unless COREN has a retrospective approval route and the provider applies for it, the activity should count as zero, or at most within a capped non-accredited allowance if the guideline provides one. The claim of 8 cannot be accepted as it stands.
Accredited conference (6 points). This is the strongest item: accredited, relevant and evidenced. It should be verified against attendance records and accepted within any event cap.
Mentoring (4 points). Mentoring may count only if the scheme is recognised and the evidence shows objectives, contact time and outcomes. A handwritten note is not adequate verification. At best this is a partial claim pending proper records.
Journal reading (4 points). Self-study is normally capped and requires a reflective record. It cannot be accepted at face value.
Conclusion. Even on a generous view, the documented total falls below the required minimum. The log cannot be endorsed as submitted.
2. How should the employer's letter be treated, and what ethical issues arise?
Read the worked answer
The letter is not accreditation. It expresses the employer's opinion that the webinar was relevant. Relevance is only one criterion; accreditation and verification are separate. A letter cannot convert a non-accredited activity into an accredited one, and COREN should not create a special route because an employer is anxious about a contract.
Improper pressure. The request to 'treat it as accredited' asks the CPD officer to depart from the published guideline. Accepting it would be unfair to engineers who completed accredited activities and would weaken the credibility of the register. The officer should decline and record the request.
Musa's declaration. The log is a professional declaration, not a marketing document. Claiming points that do not meet the criteria risks a finding of misrepresentation. Musa should correct the log rather than rely on his employer's letter.
Handling. The officer should write to Musa explaining which items are accepted, which are capped or rejected, and what evidence would be needed. The employer should be told that COREN applies the guideline uniformly. The branch should retain the correspondence in case of appeal.
3. What should Musa do to obtain a licence before the supervision contract starts?
Read the worked answer
Close the gap lawfully. Musa should identify accredited CPD activities that fit the remaining points, complete them before the renewal deadline where possible, and submit verifiable certificates and attendance records. He should replace the handwritten mentoring note with a proper log signed by the mentees and, if required, by their supervisor. Self-study should be documented in the prescribed reflective format and claimed only within the cap.
Do not practise while unlicensed. If the licence is not issued in time, Musa must not sign engineering documents or hold himself out as licensed. He should tell his employer immediately so that a licensed substitute can be appointed for the World Bank supervision role. Taking up the role and signing later would expose him and the employer to enforcement action.
Communicate with COREN. If the deadline is tight, he can ask whether a completed application can be processed in time, but he should not ask for points to be waived. A conditional or provisional arrangement, if available under the guidelines, should be requested openly rather than assumed.
Learning point. The case is a reminder that CPD is a licence condition, not an administrative formality. Waiting until renewal to assemble evidence is the root cause of the problem.