NCAA CPL Navigation Exam study materials
NCAA CPL Navigation Exam study resources

One Hundred Percent Progress, No Completion Record

NCAA CPL Navigation Exam · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

One Hundred Percent Progress, No Completion Record

Pinehurst Institute's annual rules education closes October 15. The platform report on October 8 shows 154 complete, 21 in progress at 100%, and 5 not started out of 180 assigned staff. The 21 at 100% have watched every video segment and passed the quiz with at least 80%, but their transcripts still read In Progress. Four of those 21 show Complete in the mobile app but not on the web. One is the faculty athletics representative, who needs a completion record before a board meeting on October 10. The platform uses SSO, and HR recently changed employee IDs for staff returning from leave. The administrator can see quiz attempts but not a separate attestation report. No one has checked the completion rule configuration since last year. The compliance office wants the record corrected without creating duplicate completions.

1. Diagnose why 21 learners show 100% progress but no completion. What would you check first?

Read the worked answer

Look at the completion rule, not the progress bar. A module can require video, a quiz, an attestation, an evaluation, and a final submit action; 100% progress often means content consumption only. The mobile and web split is a clue: either the mobile app is reading a cached completion, or the two surfaces are tied to different accounts. Check the backend record for each of the 21: quiz attempt and score, attestation timestamp, evaluation status, completion date, and user ID. For the four showing complete on mobile, compare the user ID on the mobile session with the web session; HR's employee-ID change may have created a second identity. Also check whether the quiz was passed before the attestation was added to the rule. Do not manually mark complete yet. The faculty athletics representative's October 10 need is real, but a false completion is worse than a documented expedite.

2. How would you remediate the 21 before the deadline, including the faculty athletics representative?

Read the worked answer

Create three remediation buckets. Missing attestation: send a direct deep link and confirm the attestation posts; this is the cleanest fix. Duplicate identity: have platform support merge the records under the correct HR ID, preserving both audit trails, then recheck the transcript. Stuck completion statement: ask support to replay or reconcile the completion event only after evidence shows all criteria were met. For the faculty athletics representative, do the same checks first; if the only gap is a system-posting delay and evidence is complete, request an expedited support fix with written confirmation. An admin override should be a last resort, approved by the compliance director, with the evidence attached. After fixes, rerun the report and compare counts; do not accept a verbal assurance that it is fixed.

3. What configuration or process changes would prevent this next cycle?

Read the worked answer

Prevent recurrence by displaying the full completion criteria on the module landing page, not just watch and pass. Add a pre-cycle test with a sample learner on web and mobile. Integrate the platform roster with HR's active-employee feed and define what happens when an ID changes. Run a duplicate-account report before assignment. Put the attestation step earlier or make it unavoidable, and test the completion rule after any content update. Give administrators a completion-detail view that shows each criterion. At the next cycle, spot-check 10 records before the deadline. Document the root cause and the fix so the same issue is not reopened as a new ticket.