NH Asbestos Abatement study materials
NH Asbestos Abatement study resources

Mid-Project Discovery in an Occupied Elementary School

NH Asbestos Abatement · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Mid-Project Discovery in an Occupied Elementary School

At a 1972 elementary school, a summer renovation is removing 1,100 sq ft of 9-inch by 9-inch floor tile and mastic and 310 linear feet of pipe insulation. The pre-renovation survey, prepared by a licensed inspector, listed those materials as asbestos-containing; the abatement contractor filed the NH notification 10 working days before the start date. On day three, inside a corridor outside the two-room containment, the crew finds 70 linear feet of friable pipe-elbow insulation above a suspended ceiling and 30 sq ft of crumbling ceiling tile. The corridor is open to custodial staff. The owner wants the crew to keep working in the classrooms and "add the new material to the paperwork later." The project monitor orders a stop in the corridor. The additional pipe insulation is 30% chrysotile; the ceiling tile is 10% chrysotile.

1. What should happen immediately in the corridor, and does the discovery require a notification amendment before work resumes there?

Read the worked answer

Stop work in the affected corridor and treat the newly found material as asbestos-containing until proven otherwise. Restrict access, post signs, and prevent custodial staff from entering. Do not dry sweep, use a shop vacuum, or disturb the friable pipe insulation. The discovery changes the scope, location, and quantity of asbestos-containing material in the project, so the existing NH notification is no longer accurate. Amend the notification with the NH DES asbestos program before disturbing the new material; do not accept the owner's "paperwork later" approach. Also check whether the NESHAP notification must be updated because the project description and quantities changed. The stop should remain in effect until the owner has an amended notification, a written scope for the corridor, and a licensed contractor ready to establish containment. Continuing work in the classrooms may be possible only if the corridor is isolated and the existing containment is verified intact.

2. How should the contractor protect building occupants and custodial staff while the corridor material is addressed?

Read the worked answer

The contractor should isolate the corridor from occupied spaces with critical barriers and locked or monitored doors, then establish negative pressure with HEPA-filtered negative air machines. Before removal, wet the friable material and HEPA-vacuum or wet-wipe adjacent surfaces; avoid any method that creates dust. Only licensed asbestos workers and supervisors should handle the material. Custodial staff should be excluded and informed of the reason. The contractor should verify containment with smoke testing or a pressure gauge and keep daily pressure records. After removal, the work area should pass a visual inspection and, where required, clearance air sampling by an independent project monitor before barriers come down. The school should also plan alternate routes and communicate with staff so no one reopens the corridor prematurely. If the corridor cannot be isolated, the adjacent classrooms should not be reoccupied until clearance is complete.

3. The owner asks whether the newly found pipe insulation can be encapsulated rather than removed. What is your advice?

Read the worked answer

Encapsulation is not a quick substitute for removal, and it cannot be used to avoid notification or licensing. If the insulation is friable, damaged, and will be disturbed by the renovation, removal is the appropriate response; NESHAP requires regulated asbestos-containing material to be removed before a renovation or demolition that will disturb it. Encapsulation may be considered for intact material in some circumstances, but it requires a licensed contractor, a written specification, surface preparation, and possibly monitoring. It also does not eliminate the need to amend the notification or to manage the material as asbestos-containing. In this case, the corridor material is already crumbling and outside containment, so the defensible decision is removal under containment rather than encapsulation in place. If the owner still wants encapsulation evaluated, have a licensed project designer or inspector document why the material is a suitable candidate before any work proceeds.