A WhatsApp Broadcast and a 15% Drawdown
In early March a distributor broadcasts on WhatsApp: "India Growth PMS - +46% in 12 months, 100% capital protection, zero tax because PMS gains are tax-free. Minimum ₹50 lakh. Only 3 slots left this quarter." A 58-year-old client invests ₹75 lakh on the strength of that message, believing he is buying the 46% product. He is actually onboarded to the firm's balanced strategy, which returns 9%, while the small-cap strategy falls 15% by September. He then learns that the 46% was one client's twelve-month return, that his distributor earns a 0.70% trail, and that his gains will be taxed in his own hands. He wants to exit immediately, wants his loss made good, and says he will approach SEBI.
1. Identify each misstatement in the broadcast and set out the obligations the firm must now discharge.
Read the worked answer
Almost every line fails. "100% capital protection" is an assurance the firm cannot give - protection requires a bank or insurer standing behind it - and assured or guaranteed returns are prohibited in PMS marketing. The 46% is a single client's twelve-month return presented as the product's performance; permissible performance claims must use composite, time-weighted returns over a stated period, against a stated benchmark, with the prescribed disclaimer. "Zero tax" is false: a PMS is not a tax wrapper, gains are taxed in the client's hands, and for listed equity the position is long-term capital gains at 12.5% above the ₹1.25 lakh exemption for transfers on or after 23 July 2024 and short-term gains at 20%, with debt and unlisted holdings taxed differently - the current rates should always be confirmed before quoting. "Only 3 slots" is artificial scarcity. The firm must withdraw and retain the material, verify whether distributor-created content was pre-approved, review its distributor due diligence and empanelment terms, disclose the 0.70% trail in writing, and remediate clients onboarded on the strength of the broadcast.
2. If the client complains, what is the escalation path, and what is he realistically entitled to recover?
Read the worked answer
He should first complain in writing to the portfolio manager's designated grievance redressal officer or compliance officer, which the firm is required to publicise; if the complaint is not resolved within 30 days or he is dissatisfied, he can escalate to SEBI's SCORES platform, and thereafter to the online dispute resolution mechanism for a determination. Recovery depends on causation, not on the fact of loss. If the loss reflects the ordinary market behaviour of a strategy that was suitable for him, the firm owes him nothing beyond proper servicing. His position is much stronger on two points: he was onboarded into the balanced strategy while being shown the small-cap performance, and the material he relied on made prohibited claims. If mis-selling is established, a reasonable remediation is to put him back in the position he would have been in had he been properly advised - refunding the distribution fee, waiving exit load, and considering compensation for the differential - with the computation documented. Assuring him of recovery before that analysis would be a second, avoidable misrepresentation.
3. The client demands an immediate exit. How should the request be handled, and what should the firm do about the distributor?
Read the worked answer
Process the exit on the documented terms: the exit load applies only if it is provided for in the disclosure document and the holding period falls within it; proceeds must be paid within 10 working days of a valid request; and a statement showing units, valuations, load and net payout must follow. Do not make the payout conditional on his withdrawing the complaint - that would raise a separate and more serious issue. Separately, investigate the distributor: check the empanelment agreement, whether distributor-generated material requires prior approval and is archived by the firm, whether the 0.70% trail was disclosed to the client in the fee consent, and whether other clients received the same broadcast. Where the conduct is established, the firm should look at suspending the empanelment, reporting the matter internally to its compliance and principal officer, and, if regulatory reporting is required, making it. The distributor's incentive to sell is the firm's responsibility to control.