Two-Office Supervision and Delegation
Dr. Alvarez owns two New Jersey dental offices. At Office A, one registered dental hygienist is scheduled to perform scaling and root planing on a patient with 5-mm periodontal pockets, and one expanded-function dental assistant (EFDA) is scheduled to place sealants on two children and take a final impression for a crown. Dr. Alvarez is seeing patients at Office B, about 25 minutes away, and no other dentist is on site. The office manager calls to say a third patient has acute pain and wants to be seen now. Dr. Alvarez asks whether he can authorize the hygienist and EFDA by phone, review the work later that afternoon, and remain at Office B. The EFDA has completed the required New Jersey expanded-function course, and the hygienist holds an active license.
1. May the hygienist and EFDA perform the scheduled procedures while Dr. Alvarez is at Office B? Explain the supervision standard that applies.
Read the worked answer
Under New Jersey Board of Dentistry rules, direct supervision means the dentist is physically present in the office, has authorized the procedure, and personally reviews the patient's care. General supervision is narrower and does not permit every delegated task. The hygienist's scaling and root planing and the EFDA's sealants and final impression are delegation tasks that require direct supervision in a private dental office unless a specific Board rule authorizes otherwise. A phone call, live video, or later review does not satisfy direct supervision. Because Dr. Alvarez is at Office B, the hygienist and EFDA cannot proceed with those tasks. The patient with acute pain also needs a dentist's evaluation; the EFDA cannot diagnose or prescribe. Therefore, the schedule must be changed or Dr. Alvarez must return to Office A before care proceeds.
2. What should Dr. Alvarez do immediately, and what documentation and corrective steps should follow?
Read the worked answer
Dr. Alvarez should either return to Office A or reschedule the delegated procedures for a time when a dentist is on site. The patient with acute pain should be evaluated by a dentist, not by the EFDA; if Dr. Alvarez cannot return, the office should arrange referral to an available dentist or urgent care and document the advice. The office should notify affected patients, document the schedule change and the reason, and correct the office policy so that direct-supervision tasks are not booked when no dentist is present. The EFDA and hygienist should not be asked to cover by phone. A written corrective action plan, staff retraining, and an audit of future schedules are prudent. Documentation should be factual and contemporaneous.
3. What disciplinary and liability risks arise from this arrangement?
Read the worked answer
Board exposure includes unprofessional conduct and practicing beyond the scope of delegation authority. Discipline can range from reprimand and civil penalties to suspension, and the Board may impose conditions on the license. If a patient is harmed, civil liability and insurance issues follow. The dentist's defense that he was available by phone is weak because the regulatory test is physical presence for direct supervision. The office manager and staff can also be witnesses. Voluntary corrective action before a complaint does not erase a violation but can mitigate it.