A Nanny Background Check Using Police Contacts and Megan's Law Information
A family hires your agency to run a pre-employment background check on 'A.S.,' a nanny applicant. The family wants 'everything - criminal, sex offender, social media, and driving.' Your friend is a police dispatcher who offers to run A.S.'s name and date of birth through the state CJIS terminal 'as a favor.' You also find a prosecutor's office contact who confirms A.S.'s brother is a Tier 2 Megan's Law registrant; A.S. herself has a 2009 municipal theft conviction and a 2015 disorderly persons conviction. The family says they will not hire her if she is 'a risk' and asks you to tell the neighborhood watch and post a warning on Facebook. You have no written consent or fingerprint card from A.S.
1. May you accept the dispatcher's offer and use the prosecutor's registry information? Why or why not?
Read the worked answer
No. Criminal history record information in New Jersey is confidential and access through CJIS is restricted to authorized criminal-justice purposes. A favor from a dispatcher is unauthorized access, even if the dispatcher means well; it can expose both of you to criminal and administrative liability and end your PDU license. The Megan's Law registry is also restricted. Tier 2 information is not public, and a prosecutor's office contact should not be confirming it to a private investigator for an employment check. Registry information may be released only through lawful notification channels and to authorized recipients. Using a personal contact to bypass those limits is a serious ethical violation and may create liability for the agency.
2. What lawful steps could you take to obtain criminal history and registry information, and what limits apply to reporting to the family?
Read the worked answer
Obtain A.S.'s written authorization and use a lawful channel: a fingerprint-based New Jersey State Police criminal history check for the permitted purpose, or an approved consumer reporting agency that complies with the Fair Credit Reporting Act. If the report is for employment, the family must follow New Jersey's Opportunity to Compete Act, including timing restrictions on criminal-history inquiries and an individualized assessment rather than an automatic rejection. Report only confirmed, relevant, and lawfully obtained information. Do not report the Tier 2 registry information; do not tell the family to rely on it. The 2009 and 2015 convictions may be reportable if lawfully obtained and within the permitted scope, but you should verify disposition and identity before reporting. Do not disclose to the neighborhood watch or on Facebook.
3. How should you respond to the family's request to warn the neighborhood and post on Facebook?
Read the worked answer
Refuse. Publication would invade A.S.'s privacy, risk defamation, and could violate Megan's Law restrictions and the confidentiality obligations you owe as an investigator. The family's hiring decision is a private employment matter, not a community-safety notification. You should explain that you will provide a lawful, confidential report to the family and that public disclosure is outside the engagement. If there is a genuine immediate safety concern, the proper channel is law enforcement, not social media. Document the refusal and the reasons in the file. The agency should also review whether it has a written contract limiting disclosure and whether the family's 'everything' request needs to be narrowed to lawful scope.