The $1,050,000 Contract That Appraised at $1,010,000
Nadia is pre-approved at 80% loan-to-value on a 30-year fixed at 6.5%, with a monthly payment factor of $6.32 per $1,000 borrowed. She signs a contract for a single-family home in Bergen County at $1,050,000 with a $52,500 deposit. The lender's appraisal comes in at $1,010,000. Annual property taxes are $22,230; hazard insurance is $1,800 a year; Nadia has a $600 monthly car payment. Underwriting uses a 28% front-end (housing) ratio and a 36% back-end (total debt) ratio. Closing is scheduled for the 15th, and the seller will pay the New Jersey realty transfer fee. Nadia asks whether the deed can simply state $999,000 "so we both save the fee."
1. Compute the loan amount, the resulting down payment, and the additional cash the appraisal gap creates.
Read the worked answer
Lenders size the loan on the lesser of the contract price or the appraised value - never on the higher contract price.
- Maximum loan: 80% × $1,010,000 = $808,000
- Nadia had expected: 80% × $1,050,000 = $840,000
- Gap: $840,000 − $808,000 = $32,000
- Actual down payment: $1,050,000 − $808,000 = $242,000 (rather than the $210,000 she planned)
So the appraisal shortfall does not shrink the price; it shifts $32,000 from lender money to buyer cash, plus closing costs. Nadia's options are to bring the extra cash, renegotiate the price with the seller, or obtain a second appraisal - and she must decide within her financing contingency period, not after.
Separately, this is a residential sale at $1,000,000 or more, so the 1% New Jersey "mansion tax" applies - $10,500, and it is the buyer's charge, not the seller's. The seller's obligation is the realty transfer fee.
2. Compute the monthly PITI and the income Nadia must document. Which ratio controls?
Read the worked answer
Principal and interest: ($808,000 ÷ $1,000) × $6.32 = 808 × $6.32 = $5,106.56
Taxes: $22,230 ÷ 12 = $1,852.50
Insurance: $1,800 ÷ 12 = $150.00
PITI: $5,106.56 + $1,852.50 + $150.00 = $7,109.06
Front-end test (28%): $7,109.06 ÷ 0.28 = $25,389.50 monthly → $304,674 annual
Back-end test (36%): ($7,109.06 + $600) ÷ 0.36 = $7,709.06 ÷ 0.36 = $21,414.06 monthly → $256,969 annual
The back-end ratio controls, because it produces the lower qualifying income. Nadia must document roughly $257,000 of annual stable income. Note the trap: a buyer who qualifies on the front-end alone will be turned down at underwriting, and the $32,000 appraisal gap does not change these figures - it only changes the loan amount and cash to close.
3. Nadia asks whether the deed can state $999,000 to avoid the fee. How should the salesperson respond?
Read the worked answer
Refuse, unambiguously, and do not participate in any version of it.
Reasoning:
- Both the realty transfer fee and the 1% fee on residential sales at $1,000,000 or more are computed on the actual consideration paid. Understating the price on the deed is a false statement, not a clever tax plan.
- The buyer also signs an affidavit of consideration at closing. The deed figure, the contract, the closing statement, and the affidavit must all agree; a $999,000 deed against a $1,050,000 contract is instantly visible.
- Consequences fall on the parties (additional assessments, penalties, and potential criminal exposure) and on the licensee who knowingly assists - a Commission disciplinary matter and a licensing risk.
- It is also a fraud on the lender, whose underwriting and loan amount rest on the true price.
The correct answer to Nadia is factual: the 1% fee is $10,500 and is a buyer's closing cost; budget for it. If she cannot afford the appraisal gap plus the fee, the conversation to have is with her attorney about the financing contingency - not about the deed.