New Jersey Surplus Lines study materials
New Jersey Surplus Lines study resources

Three Declinations and a Missing Notice

New Jersey Surplus Lines · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Three Declinations and a Missing Notice

Rosa holds a New Jersey property and casualty producer license with surplus lines authority. Her client, Meadowline Landscaping LLC, operates 14 crews out of three yards and needs $2 million general liability plus pollution coverage for herbicide application. Rosa solicits five authorized insurers. Two decline in writing, one quotes but excludes herbicide pollution, one offers a $5 million limit only at triple the price, and one never responds. On January 15 she binds coverage with an eligible surplus lines insurer at $86,000, effective February 1. The file contains the two declination letters, a note about the exclusion, and a signed statement from the insured saying it understands coverage is unavailable in the authorized market. The policy is delivered March 3 with no nonadmitted-insurer notice. A Department market conduct examiner requests the file in June.

1. Did Rosa make the diligent effort New Jersey requires before placing this risk? Explain what the file proves and what it does not.

Read the worked answer

New Jersey requires a documented, good-faith search of the authorized market for the specific coverage requested. The statute does not set a magic number of declinations, but the file must show why authorized insurers would not write the risk. Two written declines help. The quote that excludes herbicide pollution is also strong evidence, because the exclusion removes the core coverage the insured needs, not a minor term. The $5 million quote at triple the price is weaker: Rosa must show that a $2 million limit was unavailable or that the price was objectively unreasonable, not merely higher. The fifth insurer's silence must be documented with dates and follow-up. The insured's signed statement does not cure a thin file; a sophisticated buyer cannot waive the producer's statutory duty. If the search is inadequate, the placement can be treated as unauthorized insurance, exposing Rosa to Department discipline and E&O exposure.

2. What must appear on the delivered policy, and what are the consequences of the March 3 delivery without it?

Read the worked answer

The policy must carry a conspicuous notice, in the form the Department requires, stating that the insurer is not authorized to transact business in New Jersey and that the policy is not protected by the New Jersey insurance guaranty mechanism. The notice is meant to be seen before or when the insured receives the policy, not buried in a file. Delivering the policy without it is a violation even if the carrier is eligible and the premium is paid. Rosa should issue a corrected notice or endorsement immediately, document the cure, and notify her E&O carrier if the omission could have misled the insured. The Department can still cite the original delivery; a prompt cure may mitigate but does not erase the violation. She should also confirm whether certificates or binders went out with the same omission.

3. Assume the carrier is eligible and the search is adequate. Identify two remaining compliance obligations Rosa must satisfy after binding.

Read the worked answer

First, she must collect and remit the surplus lines premium tax and file the required report with the Department on the prescribed schedule, keeping the tax funds separate from agency operating money. Second, she must verify and document the carrier's eligibility on the Department list at binding and keep the declination search, policy, notices, and tax records available for examination. A third obligation, if she charges a fee, is to disclose it as required and not treat it as premium. The point is that binding is not the end of the compliance trail; the producer remains responsible for the tax, the report, and the documentary record that supports the placement.