NM Chiropractic Jurisprudence study materials
NM Chiropractic Jurisprudence study resources

NM Chiropractic Jurisprudence: Discipline, the Complaint Process, and Professional Ethics

NM Chiropractic Jurisprudence · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Discipline, the Complaint Process, and Professional Ethics

Domain 4 tests what happens after a complaint is filed - and what professional ethics require before one ever is.

The complaint process

Complaints may come from patients, other providers, insurers, courts, or the Board's own review. After intake, the Board or its investigator gathers records and statements, and the licensee is ordinarily given notice and an opportunity to respond. If the matter is not dismissed or resolved by agreement, the Board issues a notice of charges and the case proceeds to hearing under the Uniform Licensing Act: notice, an opportunity to appear and be represented by counsel, presentation of evidence, and written findings. The Board may dismiss, reprimand, impose probation with terms, suspend, revoke, assess civil penalties and costs, and attach conditions such as retraining, supervision, or practice restrictions. Final agency action is appealable to district court on the record.

Ethics that drive the docket

Documented informed consent; confidentiality with lawful exceptions (patient authorization, subpoena, mandatory reporting, Board inquiry); contemporaneous and complete records that are never altered after a complaint; truthful advertising; recognizing impairment in oneself or a colleague; and maintaining professional boundaries. Responding defensively or editing the chart after a complaint usually produces a worse outcome than the original allegation.

Worked example

A patient requests copies of their chart while a complaint is pending. The chiropractor should release the patient's own records as the law requires, retain proof of what was sent, and not "clean up" the chart. Destroying or amending records to improve the appearance of care is a separate, provable violation, and it often converts a defensible case into an indefensible one.

Traps that cost marks

  • Confusing the Board's investigative stage with the formal hearing stage.
  • Believing a private malpractice settlement ends the Board matter - it does not.
  • Forgetting the standard is the statute and rules, not local custom or what colleagues do.