The Restaurant Break-In and the Recent Limit Increase
On March 9, the owner of a Santa Fe restaurant reported a break-in and theft of $45,000 in equipment, $8,000 in cash, and $12,000 in inventory. The alarm was disarmed at 11:42 p.m.; there were no signs of forced entry; the back door was found unlocked. The owner had increased the policy's contents limit from $60,000 to $150,000 on February 27, ten days before the loss. The inventory records are handwritten and incomplete; the owner cannot produce purchase receipts for a $22,000 espresso machine or the cash. A neighbor's camera shows a van at the rear door at 1:10 a.m., but no person is visible. The owner filed a sworn proof of loss listing $65,000 total and threatens to sue if not paid within 10 days. The claim is assigned to you. The policy has a $5,000 deductible and a $10,000 limit for cash.
1. Identify the fraud indicators and explain how you should proceed without accusing the insured.
Read the worked answer
Red flags include the limit increase ten days before the loss, no forced entry, the alarm being disarmed, the missing cash and receipts, incomplete handwritten inventory, the owner's threat to sue within 10 days, and the van at the rear door without a visible person. None of these proves fraud. The adjuster should refer the file to the company's special investigation unit under the fraud plan, preserve the alarm data, video, door locks, and inventory records, and obtain a detailed recorded statement. Ask for separate inventories by category, purchase records, bank deposits, tax returns, and the espresso machine's serial number. The commercial policy likely includes an examination-under-oath and proof-of-loss provision; invoke them only per policy and company protocol. Do not accuse the insured or deny solely on suspicion. If the evidence supports a fraudulent proof of loss, the insurer may report suspected insurance fraud to OSI's fraud unit or law enforcement and should document the factual basis. Continue adjusting the undisputed portion, if any.
2. What policy provisions and documentation will determine whether the cash and equipment are covered?
Read the worked answer
Cash is subject to a specific $10,000 limit, so even a fully documented $8,000 cash loss cannot exceed that sublimit, and the $5,000 deductible may apply to the occurrence. Equipment is covered as business personal property if owned by the insured and not otherwise excluded; the $150,000 contents limit is the maximum, not a promise to pay the claimed $45,000. The insured must prove ownership and loss through receipts, serial numbers, purchase records, leases, or supplier statements. The espresso machine is a high-value item, so the adjuster should verify the serial number and consider whether it was scheduled or subject to a sublimit. The $12,000 inventory claim needs inventory records and cost documentation. The proof of loss is sworn, so discrepancies matter. The adjuster should pay only documented, covered amounts, explain reductions in writing, and reserve the right to revisit if the investigation reveals misrepresentation.