Impaired Colleague, False CE Attestation, and Patient Privacy
Dr. S is due to renew her New Mexico optometry license in 30 days. She has completed 12 of the required continuing education hours and has not yet taken the required pharmacology hours. A colleague smells alcohol on her breath at 9 a.m., sees her prescribe a controlled substance to her own family member without an examination, and later finds that Dr. S posted a patient's slit-lamp photo and name on social media. Dr. S asks the colleague to sign off on her CE attestation 'just this once' and says the Board will never check. The colleague is unsure whether to report, confront, or ignore the behavior. No patient has been harmed yet. The colleague is also Dr. S's landlord and fears retaliation.
1. What are the colleague's obligations regarding the suspected impairment, the family-member prescribing, and the social media post?
Read the worked answer
The colleague has several obligations. Suspected impairment at 9 a.m., prescribing a controlled substance to a family member without an examination, and posting a patient's name and photo are all patient-safety and professionalism issues. The colleague should not sign a false CE attestation. The colleague should report the conduct to the New Mexico Board; many boards expect licensees to report impairment or unprofessional conduct, and the report can be made in good faith. The social media post is also a privacy violation and should be documented with screenshots. The colleague should encourage Dr. S to seek help, but should not promise confidentiality. Fear of retaliation as landlord does not excuse the reporting duty; retaliation itself can be a separate issue.
2. Can Dr. S renew and continue practicing if her continuing education is incomplete?
Read the worked answer
Dr. S cannot lawfully renew by falsely attesting to completed CE. She must complete the required hours, including the pharmacology hours, before renewal or request whatever extension or remediation the Board allows. If she practices after expiration without a valid license, that is unlicensed practice and a ground for discipline. The colleague should not sign off 'just this once'; falsifying an attestation can expose both of them. If Dr. S is impaired, she should not practice while impaired and should seek evaluation. The Board may approve an impaired-practitioner program or other pathway, but that is not the same as skipping CE.
3. What due process protections apply if the Board investigates Dr. S?
Read the worked answer
If the Board investigates, Dr. S is entitled to notice of the charges, an opportunity to respond, and a hearing before discipline is imposed. She should retain counsel, preserve records, and avoid contacting patients about the complaint in a way that could be seen as intimidation. The Board must follow its rules and the Act; a licensee can present evidence of remediation, CE completion, and treatment. Due process does not guarantee a particular outcome, but it does require a fair procedure. The colleague should keep their own documentation and cooperate truthfully.